跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 21:25 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 21:44 — 2026-11-14 21:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 21:25最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 21:22(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.00328

KG-Guard: Graph-Based Hallucination Detection for Knowledge Base Question Answering

Albert Sawczyn, Piotr Bielak, Tomasz Kajdanowicz

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for knowledge base question answering (KBQA), also referred to as knowledge graph question answering (KGQA), where answering requires selecting entities from a question-specific knowledge graph subgraph. Yet LLMs are known to hallucinate across tasks, and KBQA is no exception: even when we provide a graph as the knowledge source, the model may rely on parametric knowledge instead of graph evidence or perform invalid reasoning over the given relations. Such hallucinated answer nodes can limit the practical deployment of KBQA systems, especially in high-stakes domains such as healthcare. We formulate hallucination detection in KBQA as an answer-node classification problem and propose a lightweight graph-based framework that treats the answering LLM as a black box. KG-Guard represents each KBQA instance as an augmented graph. It initializes node features with semantic representations of KG entities, marks topic entities and LLM-proposed answer nodes with learned vectors, and connects a virtual question node to the topic entities. A graph encoder then produces verification-oriented node representations, and a small MLP classifies each proposed answer node using its graph representation together with the question embedding. Experiments on WebQSP, ComplexWebQuestions, and PUGG show that our detector achieves the best average rank across all three benchmarks (F1 82.0, 87.4, and 84.3), while using ${\sim}$305$\times$ fewer parameters than LLM-based baselines. It also retains the best average rank when jointly evaluated across an extended set of pipelines and settings. Beyond detection, the node-level feedback is actionable: when flagged answers are fed back to the KBQA system for iterative refinement, downstream KBQA F1 improves by 13.0-14.5 points and Exact Match by 16.9-17.6 points.

cs.LG