跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1029新增论文
+789其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 15:15 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 15:56 — 2026-11-11 15:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 15:15最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 15:13(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14495

SkipLane: Write-Once, Conflict-Free Accumulation for Zero-Skipping CNN Engines on FPGAs

Aditya Saboo, Pratibha Verma

原文摘要

Skipping zero activations saves multiplications in CNN accelerators, but it complicates accumulation: the products in a compressed input window belong to different output columns and must be merged. In our earlier engine, this merging was done by read-modify-write (RMW) of a row buffer, which made sparse inputs slower than dense ones even at 87% sparsity. Existing designs either merge kernel rows through RMW or reduce bank conflicts with extra hardware, without eliminating them. SkipLane makes the entire accumulation path write-once. Each kernel row is processed in its own lane, which holds partial sums in three registers and retires up to three finished columns per cycle into memory banks that cannot conflict. Lanes and input channels are summed only at readout, so no partial sum is ever read back. Multipliers left idle by zero weights compute a second filter in the same pass. In RTL simulation, the engine stays within 0.5% of its frontend bound up to 70% sparsity and is 1.10-1.26$\times$ faster than an SCNN-style scatter accumulator with 18 banks and ideal RMW at 50-80% sparsity. Six engines meet 140 MHz on a PYNQ-Z2 using 21.1k LUTs and run LeNet-5 bit-exact on the board. For conv1, the engine needs 1.94$\times$ fewer cycles than a dense engine (1.26$\times$ faster end to end); for conv2, whose rows are only 13 pixels wide, it reaches 0.87$\times$ the dense speed.

cs.AR