跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 05:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 05:51 — 2026-11-08 05:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 05:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 05:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05670

Inferring Factor Importance with Explainable AI Model for Macrophage Immune Cell Polarization

Joseph Pateras, Gurseerat Kaur, D. Joshua Cohen, Barbara D. Boyan, Zvi Schwartz, Preetam Ghosh

原文摘要

Macrophages are highly plastic immune cells that dynamically shift between pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes in response to cytokines, transcriptional regulators, metabolic cues, and local microenvironment. Yet macrophage polarization is governed by nonlinear regulatory networks that are difficult to study experimentally. Here, we integrate mechanistic simulation, surrogate neural networks, and explainable machine learning to identify key regulatory drivers of polarization. We generated simulation data with a COPASI-based macrophage polarization model and used them to train an LSTM surrogate capable of reconstructing temporal macrophage marker dynamics across diverse macrophage activation states. SHAP, Individual Conditional Expectation, and Partial Dependence Plot analyses quantified feature importance, identified nonlinear response regimes, and characterized higher-order interactions among cytokines, transcription factors, and polarization markers. The model identified oxygen availability and IL10 as dominant anti-inflammatory regulators, consistently promoting M2-associated outputs such as ARG1 and VEGF. Conversely, IFN-γ, TNFα, IL12, iNOS, CXCL9, and mCXCL10 reinforced M1-associated inflammatory programs. STAT1-centered analyses identified iNOS, TNFα, and mCXCL10 levels as strong contributors to STAT1 outcomes, consistent with amplification of the IFN- γ/JAK/STAT1 inflammatory axis. VEGF negatively contributed to predicted STAT1 output, suggesting antagonism between M2 markers and M1 activation. SHAP, ICE, and PDP analyses also showed that STAT1 regulation is nonlinear and threshold-like: pro-inflammatory signals must accumulate before STAT1 rises sharply. Together, it demonstrates that the LSTM explainability framework can identify polarization drivers, uncover nonlinear regulatory thresholds, and prioritize pathways for experimental validation.

cs.CE