跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 04:00 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 04:11 — 2026-11-13 04:11(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 04:00最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 03:58(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2504.18598

BadMoE: Backdooring Mixture-of-Experts LLMs via Routing-Aware Triggers and Task-Underutilized Experts

Qingyue Wang, Qi Pang, Xixun Lin, Shuai Wang, Daoyuan Wu

原文摘要

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are rapidly becoming the standard for building scalable and efficient large language models (LLMs), thanks to their routing mechanism that activates only a subset of experts for each input. However, the modular structure and sparse activation of experts also introduce new security risks, as manipulating a small portion of experts may influence the behavior. In this work, we study a white-box, task-specific model-supply-chain setting and propose BadMoE, a routing-aware backdoor attack against MoE LLMs. We motivate BadMoE through a routing-aware decomposition of the MoE-layer output, which separates the contributions of the selected target experts from those of the remaining experts. This analysis highlights two measurable factors underlying the attack: the routing mass assigned to the target experts and their relative contribution to the layer output. Guided by this insight, BadMoE selects task-underutilized experts and utilizes routing-aware triggers to activate them, enabling reliable activation of task-specific, predefined backdoor behaviors. Specifically, BadMoE involves three steps: 1) identifying experts with low usage on a target-task calibration set, 2) optimizing a routing-aware trigger toward these experts, and 3) associating the selected-expert activations with attacker-specified behavior. We evaluate BadMoE on Mixtral, OLMoE, and Deepseek across sentiment, topic, and emotion classification, sentiment steering, and targeted refusal.

cs.CR · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03627

Not All Reasoning Generalizes: A Case Study on Learning Generalizable Reasoning Strategies in RLVR

Ziqi Pang, Yu-Xiong Wang

原文摘要

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can enable generalizable improvement for large language model (LLM) reasoning. This paper studies how to incentivize such generalization via reasoning strategies. We study this question with a controllable equation-solving framework: finding multiple inputs x for equations f(x)=y, where f is a non-bijective string function. This setting makes reasoning strategies observable while supporting a clear definition of easy-to-hard out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts, e.g., more solutions, longer y, etc. We uncover a subtle RLVR failure: it teaches the model to solve in-distribution tasks with high accuracy and structured step-by-step derivation, yet under OOD shifts, the same model abandons derivation and collapses to ineffective brute-force enumeration, causing sharp accuracy drops. This observation reveals the deeper challenges of RLVR generalization as it is neither incapable base model nor reward hacking, since the model succeeds in-distribution with the correct reasoning strategy. The key to mitigating this failure is an indirect intervention that surprisingly helps: co-training with bijective inversion tasks. Although these bijective tasks are actually not uniformly harder and even further from the non-bijective OOD evaluation, they make derivation more certain and substantially restore the correct strategy and accuracy under OOD shifts. This effect further motivates our theoretical analysis: outcome-only RLVR can shape reasoning processes through implicitly crediting the effective reasoning strategies more, even without process supervision. To conclude, our analysis framework and findings systematically reveal the crucial role and incentivization of reasoning strategies in RLVR generalization under OOD shifts. Code is available at https://github.com/ziqipang/rl_meta_thinking.

cs.LG