跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 05:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 06:24 — 2026-11-06 06:24(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 05:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 05:57(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36344

Enhancing Clinical Classifier Robustness with Deep Representation Learning Based OOD Detection on DNA Methylation Data

Md Zahangir Alom, Quynh T. Tran, Breuer Alexandar, Brent A. Orr

DNA methylation (DNAM) array-based tumor classification is a powerful clinical diagnostic tool, but models trained on fixed reference cohorts can produce faulty predictions for tumor types not represented in the training distribution. We propose an end-to-end deep representation learning-based out-of-distribution (OOD) detection framework for DNAm array data. Deep neural network (DNN) classifiers were trained on public sarcoma (SARC) (GSE140686) and brain tumor (BT) (GSE90496) cohorts, and feature vectors were extracted from bottleneck layers. Five OOD methods, including 1dimension (1D)-Subspace Analysis (1D-SSA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ridge Regression, Mahalanobis Distance (MD), and Sum of Squared Distances (SSD), were explored with 200 and 500-dimensional embeddings. Spectral discrepancy was used to discriminate in-distribution (IND) from OOD samples. Performance was measured via cross-validation, holdout samples, and an independent clinical dataset. 1D-SSA was the most effective approach. In the sarcoma-IND/brain tumor-OOD setting, the framework achieved an AUROC of 0.975 and True Negative Rate (TNR)@95TPR of 0.930, and an AUROC of 0.9569 and TNR@95TPR of 0.8660 for the brain tumor-IND/sarcoma-OOD setting. On the independent clinical test set, the method yielded a mean AUROC of 0.976, a DE of 0.032, an FPR@95TPR of 0.065, and a TNR@95TPR of 0.935. These results show deep representation-based OOD detection as a practical quality-control layer for clinical-grade methylation-based tumor classification systems.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

q-bio.GN · cs.AI · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗