跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 21:42 — 2026-11-04 21:42(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38559

A goodness of fit approach to select the optimal visit sequence for nonparametric data synthesis

R{é}my Chapelle, Bruno Falissard, Mohammed Sedki

Synthetic data are a promising way to maintain privacy while disseminating research data, thereby enabling compliance with the open science principles. Popular methods for generating synthetic data include sequential synthesis, where each variable is generated conditionally on the preceding ones in a given order. This order, also called the visit sequence of the synthesizer, is known to affect the quality of synthetic data. This raises the question of the criteria that should guide its choice. In this work, we present a novel method to perform such selection based on a goodness of fit criterion, and show that it outperforms alternative structure-based methods, both in terms of synthesis quality and time complexity. The proposed method also has the advantage of being applicable to any type of data and any class of conditional distribution models.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ML · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.35163

Sequential versus fully conditional specification for tree-based synthesis of health data

R{é}my Chapelle, Mohammed Sedki

Disseminating synthetic data in place of original ones is a promising way to enforce privacy while complying with open science principles, especially in the healthcare domain. To keep pace with the rate at which researchers collect such data, there is a need for fast and flexible synthesis procedures. A popular class of such procedures is based on models of conditional distributions induced by decision trees. Such models can be combined into a synthetic distribution following two main approaches: sequential specification and fully conditional specification. However, there is currently no recommendation on which specification to use to optimize the risk-utility tradeoffs. In this work, we use both specifications to synthesize medical datasets by combining tree-based models of conditional distributions. We compare the quality of the resulting synthetic data using several metrics of risk and utility. Our results indicate no general superiority of either specification over the other. Sequential synthesis seems sensitive to the ordering of the variables, while the fully conditional specification involves more hyperparameters and incurs higher computational costs, which may limit its suitability for off-the-shelf synthesis procedures.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ML · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗