跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 20:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 21:23 — 2026-11-08 21:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 20:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 20:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01587

Attack Patterns in Cross-chain Bridges: A Trust-based Empirical Analysis

Ishraq Samiha, Yasir Rahman, Rahma Mukta

原文摘要

The rapid growth of multiple blockchain ecosystems has made cross-chain bridges essential for transferring assets and information across independent blockchains. Their multi-component architectures, cross-chain trust assumptions, and concentration of valuable assets expose them to diverse security threats. This paper presents an empirical study of cross-chain bridge attacks based on 48 evidence-supported real-world incidents from January 2022 to August 2026. We propose a behaviour-based attack pattern architecture comprising six trust-violation attack patterns, each defined by the primary trust assumption violated by the attacker: Proof Forgery,Logic Exploitation, Event Injection, Economic-State Manipulation, Credential Seizure, and Infrastructure Hijacking. The architecture further maps these patterns to five functional domains of cross-chain bridges: Deposit, Relay, Verification, Execution, and Governance and Operations, separating how a trust assumption is violated from where the compromised trust boundary lies. The 48 incidents correspond to $2.676 billion in gross bridge-specific losses, with the ten largest incidents accounting for 92.4% of total losses. Measured on the primary loss basis, Proof Forgery and Credential Seizure make up 86.2% of all losses, and the Verification and Governance and Operations domains hold 93.9%. A handful of very large incidents drives this concentration, yet it still holds when we switch to other loss bases or reclassify the boundary cases. By tying what attackers do to the bridge functions and security assumptions they target, the architecture gives threat modelling for cross-chain bridges an empirical footing.

cs.CR