跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 22:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 23:02 — 2026-11-08 23:02(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 22:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 22:48(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01888

Prior-Guided Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Fast 4D MRI Reconstruction

Mojtaba Safari, Parag J. Parikh, Shansong Wang, Mingzhe Hu, Philip Connell, Stanley L. Liauw, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Zhen Tian 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Background and purpose: We propose PGPI4MR (prior-guided, physics-informed 4D MRI reconstruction), a deep learning method that leverages information from other respiratory phases or a setup scan, the first 30 s of the same scan, to improve 4D MRI reconstruction without extra scan time. Materials and methods: PGPI4MR is an unrolled network that reconstructs 16 respiratory phases from 60, 30, or 15 s of data, and single 3D volumes, each from 0.29-0.49 s of data, using a setup-scan image. The networks were trained once, on other volunteers, and were not retrained for new volunteers. We evaluated PGPI4MR on measured k-space from three datasets: free-breathing MR-linac (1.5T) and abdominal (3T) scans, and thigh scans with cuff compression (1.5T). All methods, including comparative models, received identical samples and were scored similarly. Results: In vivo, PGPI4MR had the lowest held-out error for 4D MRI at every scan time, and its 16 phases were ready a median of 7.5-13 s after the scan on the 2 GPUs tested. Coupling the 16 respiratory phases reduced the error at 60 s by 9.1% compared with reconstructing each phase alone. For sub-second MRI, the error at 0.49 s was 15.5% lower than that of the best comparison method, classical reconstruction toward the same prior, and on the faster GPU, every 0.29 s window was acquired and reconstructed within 0.5 s. Without retraining, PGPI4MR matched the best methods on the 3T abdominal scans but not on the thigh scans; after retraining on thigh data, it reduced the held-out error by 6.6% relative to the best comparison method. Conclusion: Prior information allowed PGPI4MR to reconstruct 4D and sub-second MRI more accurately than compressed sensing and a published 4D network, within seconds and without extra scan time. This could support 4D MRI for treatment planning and 3D motion monitoring during MR-guided radiotherapy.

cs.CV · physics.med-ph

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34600

FlexiMIND: Combined Pretrained Vision Features and Local Structure for Training-Free Deformable Medical Image Registration

Mojtaba Safari, Mingzhe Hu, Shansong Wang, Suyang Xi, Joshua Lorenz, Sean Pitroda, Aytekin Oto, Ralph R. Weichselbaum 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Objective. Deformable image registration remains challenging because corresponding anatomy may exhibit different intensity relationships. Hand-crafted modality-robust descriptors such as Modality-Independent Neighborhood Descriptor with Self-Similarity Context (MIND-SSC) and features from pretrained vision encoders provide distinct representations for correspondence estimation, but how they should be combined remains unclear. We investigate whether tighter integration improves registration over a sequential, scale-separated design. Approach. We introduce FlexiMIND, a training-free and label-free two-stage framework in which frozen FlexiCT-2D encoder features establish contextual correspondence and MIND-SSC refines the deformation within ConvexAdam. Five alternative feature-coupling strategies were evaluated under a protocol across CT-CT (DIR-Lab 4DCT 4DCT, 10 cases), MR-MR (ACDC, 50 patients), and MR-CT (Learn2Reg Abdomen MR-CT, 8 pairs) registration. Performance was assessed using target registration error (TRE), Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), SDlogJ, and local folding. Main results. FlexiMIND achieved a TRE of 1.27 mm on DIR-Lab 4DCT, a DSC of 0.807 on ACDC, and an organ-averaged DSC of 0.825 on Abdomen MR-CT. Across 15 coupling-strategy dataset comparisons, only four outperformed the reference method, with a maximum absolute improvement of 0.0043 in Dice, whereas degradation reached 20.6 % in TRE and 37.9 % in Dice. Changes in registration accuracy were closely associated with changes in deformation-field regularity, and strategies that better preserved regularity generally remained closest to the reference performance. Landmark-level analysis showed that the pretrained encoder stage primarily reduced large correspondence errors rather than uniformly improving local precision. Code is available upon acceptance at https://github.com/mosaf/FlexiMIND.

cs.CV