跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 09:15 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 09:24 — 2026-11-08 09:24(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 09:15最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 09:13(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05197

Robust Reconstruction of Power Lines from Incomplete Mobile and Aerial LiDAR Data

Mohamed Gaha, Damos Ayobo Abongo, Philippe Massicotte, Eya Ben Kacem, Wael Jaafar, Rami Langar, Christian Buteau

原文摘要

Accurate vegetation-encroachment assessment and risk mitigation require electric utilities to accurately locate and characterize distribution-network assets, including poles and power lines, and distinguish among medium-voltage, low-voltage, neutral, and telecommunication lines. Mobile and aerial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds provide detailed 3D representations of these assets and their surroundings. However, power-line detection and reconstruction remain challenging because conductor returns are often sparse, incomplete, noisy, or occluded by vegetation. These challenges are especially significant in distribution networks, where lower pole heights and complex line configurations place conductors close to trees. In addition, mobile and aerial LiDAR datasets differ substantially in point density, viewing geometry, spatial coverage, and occlusion patterns. We propose a robust and automated reconstruction method combining scaled density-based clustering, robust polynomial fitting, and iterative fragment merging to recover individual conductors under severe data incompleteness and occlusion. Following semantic classification, the same reconstruction pipeline processes both mobile and aerial LiDAR data without modality-specific code or parameter tuning. The method is evaluated through degradation experiments, benchmarking, parameter sensitivity analysis, and large-scale validation. On the aerial dataset, it achieves 96.87% precision, 96.66% recall, a 96.76% F$_1$-score, and a geometric RMSE of 0.127 m. On the mobile dataset, where conductor-level reference annotations were unavailable, it achieves a point-to-model RMSE of 0.045 m and a reconstruction coverage of 95.27%. Source code, documentation, and evaluation data are publicly available at https://github.com/varen-project.

cs.CV