跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5118新增论文
+4231其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 02:58各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 02:59 — 2026-11-05 02:59(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 02:58库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

13,795 已收录论文11,906 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-demo.76ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

DIAGRAMS : A Review Framework for Reasoning-Level Attribution in Diagram QA

Anirudh Iyengar Kaniyar Narayana Iyengar Arizona State University, Tampu Ravi Kumar Arizona State University, Manan Suri, Raviteja Bommireddy, Dinesh Manocha University of Maryland, College Park, Puneet Mathur Adobe Systems, Vivek Gupta Arizona State University

Diagram question answering (Diagram QA) requires reasoning-level attribution that links each question-answer pair to all visual regions needed to derive the answer, rather than only the region containing the final response. Creating such structured evidence across diagrams, charts, maps, circuits, and infographics is time-consuming, and existing annotation tools tightly couple their interfaces to dataset-specific formats. We present DIAGRAMS, a lightweight, schema-driven review framework that decouples interface logic from dataset-specific JSON structures through an internal meta-schema and dataset adapters. Given an image and QA pair with optional candidate regions, the system performs QA-conditioned evidence selection and proposes the regions required for reasoning. When QA pairs or candidate regions are missing, it generates them and supports human verification and refinement. Across six Diagram QA datasets, model-suggested evidence achieves 85.39% precision and 75.30% recall against reviewer-final selections (micro-averaged). These results indicate that the review-first framework reduces the number of regions that annotators must create from scratch. Human reviewers accept, edit, or reject each proposed region before export, which structurally limits over-reliance on AI proposals. We release a public demo and installable package to support dataset auditing, grounded supervision creation, and grounded evaluation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗