跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 19:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 20:20 — 2026-11-10 20:20(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 19:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 19:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09052

StreamTab: Training-Free Temporal Link Prediction with Tabular Foundation Models

Mingqi Yang, Renqi Wu

原文摘要

Temporal link prediction uses past interactions to predict whether two nodes will interact in the future. Temporal graph neural networks achieve strong results on this task, but they are trained separately for each graph. How a model should use interaction history also depends on the candidates it is compared with. A past interaction can distinguish a recurring link from a random pair that has never interacted, but when the negative candidates have also interacted before, other signals are needed. We propose StreamTab, a training-free framework built on a frozen tabular foundation model pretrained only on synthetic tables. StreamTab describes each candidate pair by statistics of its past interactions and shows the model recent observed interactions and sampled negative pairs as labeled examples, from which the model scores new candidates. Its central design, regime conditioning, samples the negative examples according to how the candidates are sampled, so the examples show the distinction the model must make. As new interactions arrive, StreamTab updates the statistics and refreshes the examples while the model parameters stay fixed. On thirteen datasets against 21 temporal graph baselines, StreamTab achieves the highest average precision on twelve datasets under historical sampling and eleven under inductive sampling, and ranks first or stays within one point of the best on seven datasets under random sampling. With the same features and model, regime conditioning raises average precision over examples with random negatives by a median of 12.6 points under historical sampling.

cs.LG · cs.DB · cs.SI