跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6108新增论文
+5221其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 06:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 04:38各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 06:05 — 2026-11-05 06:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 06:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 04:38库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,785 已收录论文12,896 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 05:58(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2602.02457

MetaCLASS: Metacognitive Coaching for Learning with Adaptive Self-regulation Support

Naiming Liu, Richard Baraniuk, Shashank Sonkar

Large language models can generate fluent explanations, but effective tutoring requires supporting the learner's thought process, not just delivering content. Metacognitive tutoring targets this gap by prompting planning, monitoring, debugging, and evaluation, and, crucially, deciding when to be active versus minimally present, based on learner signals and trajectory. We introduce MetaCLASS, a learning-science grounded framework that formulates metacognitive tutoring as move selection over 11 interpretable actions aligned to self-regulated learning (SRL) processes. MetaCLASS uses a two-phase procedure that first plans a pedagogical trajectory conditioned on learner profiles (calibration, help-seeking) and then generates natural dialogue consistent with that plan. This process yields 1,015 conversations spanning 7,711 turns, each annotated with turn-level metacognitive labels and supported by comprehensive validation analyses. We benchmark nine open-source LLMs on predicting the next coach move given a question and dialogue context. The best model achieves only 43.2% accuracy in coach move prediction, and models exhibit compulsive intervention bias: in turns where effective metacognitive tutoring requires silence (41.7% of cases), models predict "no intervention'' only 6.6% of the time, while severely over-predicting high-intervention moves. These results show that traditional content-based tutoring ability does not translate to metacognitive tutoring competence, positioning MetaCLASS as a testbed for developing tutors that promote SRL.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CY
arXiv ↗PDF ↗