跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 03:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 03:35 — 2026-11-08 03:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 03:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 02:59(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.05229

Santa Claus and Weighted Nash Social Welfare with Subadditive Valuations

Yuhang Chen, Yuda Feng, Weijiang Hu, Shi Li, Ruilong Zhang

原文摘要

We study max-min allocation (the Santa Claus problem) and weighted Nash social welfare for $n$ agents with subadditive valuations over $m$ indivisible items. Using demand queries, we give randomized polynomial-time approximation algorithms with factors $O(\sqrt n)$ and $O(Γ(w))$, respectively, where $Γ(w)=\exp((\ln n-H(w))/2)$ and $H(w)=-\sum_i w_i\ln w_i$ for positive weights summing to one. Both ratios are independent of $m$. The max-min result improves the $2n-1$ bound of Khot and Ponnuswami (2007). We also give simpler $O(\sqrt n)$ algorithms for additive valuations and for submodular valuations with value queries, improving the $O(\sqrt{n\log n})$ bound of Saha and Srinivasan (2018) in the additive case. For Nash welfare, $Γ(w)=1$ for equal weights and $Γ(w)\le\sqrt n$ in general. We prove a configuration-LP integrality gap of $Θ(Γ(w))$ for every prescribed weight vector, even for XOS valuations. For every fixed $D>0$, we also prove information-theoretic approximation lower bounds of $Ω_D(\sqrt{n/\ln n})$ and $Ω_D(Γ(w)/\sqrt{\ln n})$, respectively, for randomized algorithms making at most $n^D$ adaptive queries. These hold on XOS instances with $m=Θ(n)$ items, even with simultaneous access to value, demand, and XOS supporting-clause oracles. They apply both to guarantees with success probability at least $2/3$ and to guarantees in expected welfare. The weighted bound holds for every prescribed weight vector and is vacuous below one. Thus the oracle lower bounds are within an $O(\sqrt{\ln n})$ factor of our upper bounds, while the configuration-LP gaps match them up to constants. Our algorithms build on random matchings for large items and charge the aggregate loss across configurations to the at most $n$ matched items.

cs.DS