跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 18:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 19:19 — 2026-11-11 19:19(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 18:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 18:20(北京时间)
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2511.13502

SnapAudit: Active Auditing of Differentially Private In-Context Learning via Snapshot-Based Simulation

Yuyang Xia, Ruixuan Liu, Li Xiong

原文摘要

In-context learning (ICL) enables LLMs to adapt to tasks using demonstrations that may contain sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) ICL mechanisms mitigate this risk by adding noise during aggregation. However, verifying their claimed privacy bounds through repeated end-to-end membership-inference attacks is costly and yields unstable estimates. We propose SnapAudit, an active auditing framework that decomposes a DP-ICL pipeline into a deterministic clean-inference stage and a stochastic DP-noise stage, and audits the full pipeline by combining a small snapshot of the former with bootstrap simulation of the latter. Because clean LLM outputs are near-deterministic at low temperature, tens of thousands of clean LLM calls suffice to approximate the snapshot distribution; SnapAudit then bootstraps hundreds of thousands of noisy trials at negligible additional cost, controlling finite-sample uncertainty via an empirical Bernstein correction. For embedding-based mechanisms, a multi-sweep search constructs maximally separable audit signals. Compared with passive auditing, SnapAudit yields tighter, more stable privacy estimates that closely match theoretical guarantees. Across privacy budgets, SnapAudit reuses snapshots across noise configurations, whereas passive auditing requires fresh end-to-end trials. Across four DP-ICL pipelines and five privacy budgets, this reduces total wall-clock auditing time by $4.3$--$5.5\times$. SnapAudit also uncovers two flaws in existing DP-ICL designs: (i) classical Gaussian noise calibrations underestimate leakage at large privacy budgets, allowing empirical leakage to exceed the theoretical bound; (ii) an embedding-aggregation mechanism's sensitivity analysis is incorrect when the number of partitions equals one, leading to undersized noise and a privacy violation.

cs.CR