跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3374新增论文
+3079其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+99新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 01:13 — 2026-11-06 01:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03875

INSIGHT-HPC: An Interpretable System Intelligence for Global HPC Telemetry

Rupak Kadel, Jie Li, Yong Chen

Modern high-performance computing (HPC) clusters integrate multi-generation CPUs and GPUs, which generate rich, high-dimensional telemetry streams from out-of-band baseboard management controllers (BMC), job schedulers, and facility power distribution units. Detecting anomalies within this telemetry is critical to prevent energy waste and costly node failures. Existing approaches often rely primarily on statistical deviations and require stronger labels than actual production environments can provide. In addition, these detectors have a limited operational context for interpreting alerts. We present INSIGHT-HPC, a multi-plane anomaly-detection architecture that combines statistical, workload-aware, and physics-guided evidence into operator-interpretable episodes. INSIGHT-HPC integrates heterogeneous, large-scale telemetry streams and transforms noisy minute-resolution observations into de-duplicated fault episodes with operator-facing explanations. This design allows the system to distinguish workload-explained behavior from genuine infrastructure anomalies while producing interpretable alert summaries for operators. On production HPC telemetry with weak operational labels and controlled HPC-relevant fault injections, INSIGHT-HPC achieves a stronger precision-recall balance than all evaluated baselines. The system achieves a precision of 0.913, a recall of 0.817, an F1 score of 0.862, and an AUROC of 0.896. These results demonstrate the value of combining workload context, physical consistency, and explainable episode-level fusion.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DC · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗