跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 07:04 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 07:06 — 2026-11-05 07:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 07:04最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 07:02(北京时间)
首次观测 · 记录 #1CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:35844cbf8020acb236e8bcc26b933b49CVF · CVPR 2026

Bias at the End of the Score

Magid, Salma Abdel, Guo, Grace, Tureci, Esin, Dharmasiri, Amaya, Ramaswamy, Vikram V., Pfister, Hanspeter, Russakovsky, Olga

Reward models (RMs) are inherently non-neutral value functions designed and trained to encode specific objectives, such as human preferences or text-image alignment. RMs have become crucial components of text-to-image (T2I) generation systems where they are used at various stages for dataset filtering, as evaluation metrics, as a supervisory signal during optimization of parameters, and for post-generation safety and quality filtering of T2I outputs. While specific problems with the integration of RMs into the T2I pipeline have been studied (e.g. reward hacking or mode collapse), their robustness and fairness as scoring functions remains largely unknown. We conduct a large scale audit of RM robustness with respect to demographic biases during T2I model training and generation. We provide quantitative and qualitative evidence that while originally developed as quality measures, RMs encode demographic biases, which cause reward-guided optimization to disproportionately sexualize female image subjects, reinforce gender/racial stereotypes, and collapse demographic diversity. These findings highlight shortcomings in current reward models, challenge their reliability as quality metrics, and underscore the need for improved data collection and training procedures to enable more robust scoring.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表

CVF · CVPR 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:c505e14f4e19d0210d84bbb3c87e5b0dCVF · CVPR 2026

Beyond Objects: Contextual Synthetic Data Generation for Fine-Grained Classification

Yang, William, Wu, Xindi, Deng, Zhiwei, Tureci, Esin, Russakovsky, Olga

Text-to-image (T2I) models are increasingly used for synthetic dataset generation, but generating synthetic training data to improve fine-grained classification performance remains challenging. Fine-tuning the T2I model with a few real examples can help generate more appropriate synthetic training data; however, this fine-tuning may also introduce overfitting and reduce diversity in the generated samples. We propose a fine-tuning strategy BOB (Beyond OBjects) for mitigating these concerns. Given a small set of real examples, we first describe them using class-agnostic attributes such as scene background and object pose. We then explicitly condition on these attributes during fine-tuning of the T2I model and marginalize them out during generation. This design mitigates overfitting, thus preserving the T2I model's generative prior and reducing estimation errors, and further minimizes unintended inter-class associations. Extensive experiments across multiple T2I models, backbones, and datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in low-shot fine-grained classification when augmented with synthetic data. Concretely, BOB outperforms DataDream by 7.4% on the Aircraft dataset (from 50.0% to 57.4% when fine-tuning a CLIP classifier with 5 real images augmented with 100 synthetic images). Additionally, in three of the four datasets, the fine-tuning downstream models with synthetic data generated from BOB and five real images achieves better performance than fine-tuning with 10 real images. Collectively, BOB outperforms prior art in 18 of 24 experimental settings, with over 2% accuracy improvements in 14 of these settings.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表

CVF · CVPR 2026 ↗PDF ↗