跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 18:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 18:51 — 2026-11-08 18:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 18:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 18:39(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01910

EAGR: Evidence-Guided Adaptive Graph Retrieval

Sonam Gupta, Vignesh P, Vishwajeet Kumar, Adnan Qidwai, Anand Eswaran, Jaydeep Sen, Sachindra Joshi

原文摘要

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for multi-hop reasoning requires retrieval to adapt as intermediate evidence reveals new information needs. Existing approaches support such retrieval through explicit graph structures or iterative query reformulation, introducing graph-construction or query-time overhead. We present Evidence-Guided Adaptive Graph Retrieval (EAGR), a framework in which accumulated evidence dynamically determines which semantic directions to explore next, and which requires no dedicated graph database and no explicit graph materialization. EAGR operates over an implicit semantic graph induced by compact passage metadata pre-ingested into a standard VectorDB. Starting from dense-retrieval seed passages, an LLM iteratively assesses accumulated evidence, identifies promising semantic directions, expands the retrieval frontier through metadata-based neighborhood lookup, and terminates once sufficient evidence has been collected. By precomputing semantic metadata, EAGR enables evidence-conditioned graph exploration without materializing an explicit graph, maintaining a dedicated GraphDB, or iteratively rewriting the query. Across three widely used multi-hop QA benchmarks, EAGR achieves the highest LLM-based answer accuracy among evaluated methods, outperforming the vanilla RAG by 17\% and strongest graph-aware baseline by 4\% percentage points averaged across three popular benchmarks HotPotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue.

cs.IR