跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 01:54 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 02:52 — 2026-11-10 02:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 01:54最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 01:52(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06349

PMRecBench: A Benchmark for Personalization in Recommendation Agents under Multimodal Queries

Xiaoyu Zhang, Yougang Lyu, Bin Wu, Sahan Bulathwela, Emine Yilmaz

原文摘要

On Web platforms for shopping and entertainment, recommendation agents under multimodal queries aim to deliver personalized recommendations that satisfy users' visually specified requirements and reflect preferences inferred from user histories. However, existing personalized recommendation benchmarks use text-only queries, while multimodal ones assess query matching without evaluating personalization based on real user histories. We introduce the Personalized Multimodal Recommendation Benchmark (PMRecBench), the first benchmark to evaluate the personalization of recommendation agents under multimodal queries. It pairs 510 quality-controlled image-text queries across clothing and movies with the corresponding users' real histories. PMRecBench features two key designs: (1) queries derived from consistent behavioral patterns in real user records, with reference images and targets linked to actual interactions; and (2) challenging diagnostic pools with candidate items rated highly by the user but violating requirements, and items satisfying requirements but never rated highly, testing requirement understanding and preference following, respectively. Extensive experiments on diagnostic pools reveal a personalization imbalance in recommendation agents: relative to personalization signals alone, adding multimodal queries weakens preference following, even though the additional information about query requirements improves overall ranking performance. Further analysis links this decline in preference following to image interpretation, where agents can prioritize resemblance to reference images over evidence from user histories, and stronger commercial backbones alone fail to resolve this imbalance. This personalization imbalance highlights a central challenge for recommendation agents: improving ranking performance while preserving preference following when responding to multimodal user queries

cs.IR

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.23284

Annotrace: A Workbench for Step-Level Annotation of Agent Traces

Chenyi Huang, Arun Josephraj Arokiaraj, Bin Wu, Sahan Bulathwela

原文摘要

Every study of why LLM agents fail begins by labelling traces by hand, and every such study builds its own throwaway tool. Observability platforms record agent traces but offer no structured labelling; annotation tools label text but have no notion of a step, a delegation or a tool call, leaving it unclear what the smallest unit of execution to label should be. Annotrace reads six trace formats, including OpenTelemetry GenAI, LangSmith and Langfuse, and turns each run into an ordered, nested list of steps. The annotator writes their own labelling codebook; a frontier model proposes a starting set from a sample of their own traces, answers first, and is asked exactly the questions the human is asked, making annotation a joint human-AI process. Annotrace measures agreement between any two annotators, human or AI. On a multi-agent question-answering corpus it reproduces a previous manual effort's 235 annotation units exactly, and two models labelling the same traces agree 91% of the time at $κ= 0.82$.

cs.AI · cs.CL · cs.HC · cs.MA