跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 14:38 — 2026-11-04 14:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38110

SPARSEBLEED: Bypassing Attribute-Inference Defenses via Sparsity Optimizations

Darsh Asher, Farshad Dizani, Joshua Kalyanapu, Ro Cammarota, Aydin Aysu, Samira Mirbagher Ajorpaz

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely deployed in safety- and privacy-critical domains such as healthcare and finance, where models are trained on confidential data. This paper presents the first hardware-level attribute-stealing attack that bypasses state-of-the-art privacy defenses, revealing that accelerator optimizations intended for performance can directly undermine data confidentiality. SparseBleed requires no access to gradients, logits, model weights, ground-truth labels, power traces, DVFS manipulation, shared caches, or other channels. Instead, we show that sparsity-driven execution paths encode stable timing signatures that act as a surrogate for model confidence, enabling high-fidelity attribute inference from a single query. SparseBleed generalizes across heterogeneous backends and hardware engines, including Intel AVX2/AVX-512/AMX, NVIDIA Ampere Tensor Cores with 2:4 sparsity, and nine well-known sparse and dense libraries such as Intel oneDNN, oneMKL SparseBLAS, and NVIDIA cuSPARSE. We evaluate SparseBleed to infer sensitive input attributes and true output labels. On Texas-100X, SparseBleed infers sensitive input attributes such as Sex with 66.39% accuracy and recovers the true output label, Surgical Procedure, with 99.8% accuracy. Finally, we evaluate mitigations. Constant-time execution by disabling sparsity optimizations is expensive (e.g., up to $2\times$ higher latency on NVIDIA Sparse Tensor Cores and $\approx 25\%$ higher power in AMX microbenchmarks). By contrast, a padding defense that equalizes responses to the worst-case time masks timing leakage with only 7.24% average performance overhead across nine libraries on Texas-100X/Adult and near-zero extra energy.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR · cs.AR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗