跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 16:14 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 16:49 — 2026-11-12 16:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 16:14最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 16:12(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13862

Where to Approximate in Neurosymbolic Inference?

Samy Badreddine, Emile van Krieken, Luciano Serafini, Antonio Vergari

原文摘要

Probabilistic neurosymbolic methods rely on weighted model counting (WMC) to combine neural predictors with symbolic constraints. Exact WMC is #P-hard and typically scales poorly, so many methods resort to approximations. By unifying existing approaches under a three-step bottom-up approximate compilation pipeline, we study where approximation budget is best allocated. Inspired by tensor networks, we instantiate two steps with tensor train decompositions and derive new pipelines that exactly multiply approximated factors and recompress their products via SVD- or interpolation-based schemes. Across six tasks in Sudoku, arithmetic reasoning, and scene understanding, and across increasing problem sizes, our pipelines produce WMC estimates orders-of-magnitude more accurate than prior methods. This translates into stronger downstream learning on tasks where reasoning relies on tight interactions between symbolic factors, where cruder approximations ignore these dependencies. Our pipelines open novel design space for effective approximate compilation of challenging probabilistic reasoning tasks.

cs.LG