In the real world, mobile manipulation robots must perform complex object interactions and make multi-step decisions, often relying on task-relevant information that is no longer observable. However, existing benchmarks provide limited evaluation of such memory-dependent decision-making in mobile manipulation. To address this gap, we introduce RoboCasa-Mem, a new benchmark comprising nine mobile manipulation tasks that require agents to use interaction history at key decision points. Specifically, the tasks are grouped into two categories of memory: One is environment memory, which captures spatial locations, object attributes, and object relationships. The other is process memory, which captures single-task progress and multi-task scheduling. Particularly, we introduce Behavior-Conditioned Evaluation. For tasks with multiple valid execution paths, instead of fixing a single target or trajectory, the evaluator derives later task constraints from the robot's earlier actions. This allows us to evaluate whether later behavior is consistent with the robot's own interaction history while reducing shortcuts based on fixed target assignments. We provide 1,800 successful demonstrations for policy training. We also develop a baseline on our benchmark, namely Hierarchical Memory-Augmented Policy(HMAP). Its high-level planner uses structured entity and process memories to generate subtasks. Its low-level VLA controller uses subgoal-conditioned queries to incorporate VGGT-Omega geometry into action generation. Together, RoboCasa-Mem and HMAP baseline support systematic evaluation of memory-dependent behavior and the development of memory-aware mobile manipulation policies.
Yijie Hu, Wei Li, Junjie Zhou, Zhiqi Jiang, Yi Jin, Licong Xu, Xinkai Sun, Kai Duan 等 9 位作者
Patent practice lies at the intersection of technical, legal, and linguistic work, making it challenging yet crucial to technological innovation. Recently, rapid advances in large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems have demonstrated the potential to complete realistic business workflows and even patent works. This raises a question: can current AI systems perform patent work reliably? Existing benchmarks cover a limited range of patent tasks and simplify evidence acquisition by providing reference materials or candidate documents. In this paper, we introduce PatentAgentBench, a benchmark comprising 510 instances across eight task suites: novelty search, freedom-to-operate (FTO) search, design FTO, invalidity search, claim charting, patent drafting, office-action response, and patent translation. Curated from real patent records and professional materials, the benchmark combines task-specific metrics with expert-reviewed annotations and rubrics. Retrieval tasks such novelty search, FTO, etc., require agents to search and compare patent collections without a supplied candidate pool. The drafting and OAR tasks assess the quality of agents' work given technical disclosure and office action notice. We evaluate seven LLMs across four agent harnesses on PatentAgentBench, finding that current systems still struggle to identify novelty, assess risk, and understand practitioner intent throughout patent workflows.