跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 20:39 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 20:44 — 2026-11-09 20:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 20:39最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 20:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36428

FORESEE-MS: Toward Prospective Spatial Forecasting of Future Multiple Sclerosis Lesions from Baseline FLAIR MRI

Maryam Akhavan Aghdam, Sudip Mittal, Noorbakhsh Amiri Golilarz, Shahram Rahimi

原文摘要

Traditional multiple sclerosis (MS) image analysis has primarily focused on retrospectively detecting and segmenting lesions. This study investigates whether baseline FLAIR MRI can identify regions at risk for future lesion formation beyond population-level spatial patterns. We introduce FORESEE-MS, an evaluation protocol that uses a fold-specific population-prior atlas as a baseline and assesses predictions using pooled voxel-level discrimination (AUROC and AUPRC) and within-patient lesion localization (Recall@Top-K%), with patient-level bootstrap confidence intervals. We evaluated five deep learning models (3D U-Net, Attn+ResBlock+VAE, ViT, and two SwinUNETR variants) using 5-fold cross-validation on 39 subjects from the MSSEG-2 dataset. The atlas achieved the highest pooled voxel-level AUROC and AUPRC, with no deep learning model reliably outperforming it on either metric. However, the 3D U-Net and Attn+ResBlock+VAE achieved higher mean voxel-level within-patient Recall@Top-K% than the atlas at all evaluated thresholds, although most paired confidence intervals for the differences included zero. These findings suggest that baseline FLAIR may contain patient-specific predictive information, but in this small cohort, it remains uncertain whether this information improves lesion forecasting beyond a population-prior atlas.

cs.CV