跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1691新增论文
+1393其中 AI 相关
+98已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-10 12:17 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-10 12:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 12:58 — 2026-11-10 12:58（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-10 12:17最近发现新增版本：2026-11-10 12:22库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-09 00:55

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

19,579 已收录论文16,681 AI 相关5,189 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 12:16（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11118

When gene summaries reveal the answers: Gene Ontology circularity in gene embedding benchmarks

Jiawei Wu, Huishu Wang, Junlin Chen, Hongyi Wang

原文摘要

A gene summary can contain the very annotations used to evaluate an embedding of its text. The Alliance of Genome Resources converts Gene Ontology (GO) annotations into sentences, which NCBI Gene displays and GenePT includes in its input. These summaries covered 6,172 of 19,256 human protein-coding genes (32.1%), including 58% of genes with one to ten linked publications. We embedded the same corpus with and without the generated summaries and refitted a function-prediction probe on each version. Among genes with one to ten publications, removal reduced the reported per-gene area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) by 0.078 with a linear probe (95% bootstrap interval 0.072-0.084) and by 0.033 with a multilayer perceptron. These estimates use a historical GO scorer that mishandled ties. The original predictions are unavailable for rescoring. A simple TF-IDF encoder also benefited from the summaries, as did models evaluated only on experimental annotations. Replacing generated summaries with UniProt function descriptions recovered much of the lost performance despite little verbatim overlap. UniProt also curates many of the evaluation labels. In mouse and yeast, we found a similar dependence on the source of the description. We introduce GeneProv to compare encoders on matched text and to examine how representation rankings change across GO recovery, non-GO endpoints and co-essentiality.

cs.LG · q-bio.GN

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11104

Tracing MCP Security Vulnerabilities: Constructing and Analyzing an MCP Security Vulnerability Dataset

Xu He, Sagar Patel, Shu Wang

原文摘要

As a core protocol for integrating large language models (LLMs) with external data sources and tools, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) has quickly become a key interface in emerging AI agent systems. As the MCP ecosystem expands, reported vulnerabilities have also increased, creating a growing software-security attack surface. However, MCP vulnerability information remains scattered, noisy, and difficult to study systematically. This paper addresses that gap by constructing a curated MCP vulnerability dataset from CVE disclosures. Starting from 119 MCP-related records retrieved through February 2026, we filter unrelated cases out and obtain a validated snapshot of 24 MCP vulnerabilities. Our filtering methodology explicitly addresses acronym ambiguity and achieves 96.7% inter-rater agreement on a sampled exclusion audit while retaining all known high-severity MCP cases identified in public advisories. Using this initial dataset snapshot, we find that 87.5% of validated vulnerabilities are Critical or High severity, and that injection and path traversal vulnerabilities account for 66.7% of cases. We further identify recurring issues involving insufficient input validation, inadequate access control, and protocol-level security gaps. Through six representative case studies, we illustrate common exploitation patterns and map them to practical defenses. We release the dataset, reproducibility tooling, and a sustainable maintenance workflow as a foundation for future MCP security measurement, benchmarking, and defense research.

cs.CR

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36813

Words or Deeds? How LLMs Predict Users' Decisions in Human-Agent Dialogue

Baiqiao Zhang, Shuai Ma, Zhifeng Liao, Chao Zhou, Jianshu Wang, Yuhan Zhao, Chaoyue Zhang, Tongjun Si 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

Web systems increasingly predict users' decisions from what users say, yet when interests partly conflict, users may promise to cooperate to win the other side's cooperation and then not do so. Sales or service agents that rely on such promises may grant concessions to users who then do not keep their promises, at a cost to the party they represent. We test how LLMs combine users' statements with decision records to predict users' decisions, using 1,260 rounds in which 42 users played a repeated prisoner's dilemma-style game with five agents, each prompted to express a dominant Big Five trait, and could talk with the agent before every decision. Across eight open-weight LLMs, predictions from decision records separated cooperation from defection well (AUC = .80), and adding dialogue brought no detectable gain. With dialogue, predictions agreed with users' statements more often, and errors concentrated on rounds in which users broke their statements: accuracy on rounds with a statement barely changed (.73 to .74), while it rose on kept statements (.76 to .95) and fell sharply on broken ones (.65 to .17). Predictions weighted statements more heavily than users' behavior warranted: when users stated a decision they had not yet made in that game, the predicted probability of keeping it rose from .13 to .69, whereas users kept .40 of such statements. Users' decisions also varied with the agent they faced, but predictions hardly reflected this: users cooperated more with the Agreeableness agent than with the Extraversion agent (70.6% vs. 54.5%), whereas predicted cooperation was nearly identical (64.5% vs. 63.1%). Users also cooperated more with an agent when they themselves scored higher on that agent's trait, whereas predicted cooperation barely changed with these scores. Dialogue-based predictions should therefore weigh users' statements by their earlier decisions and the agent they face.

cs.CL · cs.HC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.820ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following

Yun He Meta, Wenzhe Li Princeton University, Hejia Zhang Facebook, Songlin Li Facebook and Stanford University, Karishma Mandyam, Sopan Khosla Facebook, Yuanhao Xiong University of California, Los Angeles, Nanshu Wang Facebook 等 25 位作者

原文摘要

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to impressive performance on a range of tasks, yet advanced instruction following (IF)—especially for complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instructions—remains a significant challenge. Rigorous evaluation and effective training for such capabilities are hindered by the lack of high-quality, human-annotated benchmarks and reliable, interpretable reward signals. In this work, we introduce AdvancedIF, a comprehensive benchmark featuring over 1,600 prompts and expert-curated rubrics that assess LLMs’ ability to follow complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. We also open-source the evaluation script of AdvancedIF. We further propose RIFL (Rubric-based Instruction-Following Learning), a novel post-training pipeline that leverages rubric generation, a finetuned rubric verifier, and reward shaping to enable effective reinforcement learning for instruction following. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RIFL substantially improves the instruction-following abilities of LLMs, achieving a 6.7% absolute gain on AdvancedIF and strong results on public benchmarks. Our ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of each component in RIFL. This work establishes rubrics as a powerful tool for both training and evaluating advanced IF in LLMs, paving the way for more capable and reliable AI systems.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表