跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 13:00 — 2026-11-04 13:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39211

Mathematics and Efficiency of Song's CVP Hardness Reduction

Shuhong Gao

Song (2026) proves that, for every fixed $0<ε<1$, the closest codeword problem (CCP) for binary linear codes under Hamming distance is NP-hard to approximate within $N^{1-ε}$, where $N$ is the code length, under deterministic polynomial-time many-one reductions. The code-to-lattice construction gives hardness within $N^{1/2-ε/2}$ for Euclidean CVP, with the same $N$ aslattice rank. This reaches every fixed Euclidean hardness exponent below one half. Aharonov and Regev (2005), with the constant refined by Gao (2026), place GapCVP at factor $cN^{1/2}$ in $\mathrm{NP}\cap\mathrm{coNP}$ for every fixed $c>2/(π\sqrt3)\approx0.3676$. NP-hardness at that scale would imply $\mathrm{NP}=\mathrm{coNP}$. This paper has two goals: to explain Song's theorem and its mathematics for graduate students, and to make the reduction more efficient. The reduction turns satisfiability into a system of quadratic equations and then into CCP for binary linear codes, and recovers assignments from recurrence relations of algebraic moments. We adapt the method to linear codes over any fixed finite field of characteristic $p$. A common recurrence for each block column gives a moment window $L=c_p(κ-1)+1$, where $c_p=\max\{2,p-1\}$ and $κ$ is the rank cutoff. Together with ordinary digit products and flexible sampling, this reduces interpolation degrees and output lengths. For CCP gap $N^{1-ε}$, our explicit schedule gives code length and lattice rank at most $n^{4/ε^2+O(1/ε)}$; Song's prescribed binary schedule gives $n^{8/ε^2+O(1/ε)}$. Here $n$ counts variables in a common quadratic system, equal to the number of original variables plus clauses for 3SAT. These are dimension bounds, not optimality claims or running-time exponents. The limiting hardness exponents remain Song's.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CC
arXiv ↗PDF ↗