跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1004新增论文
+764其中 AI 相关
+53已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 11:08 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 11:08各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 12:01 — 2026-11-06 12:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 11:08最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 11:08库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 21:31

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

16,570 已收录论文14,246 AI 相关3,741 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 11:06(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04371

Embodied AI for Scientific Discovery: From Physical Action to Scientific Evidence

Wenhao Xu, Changwei Wang, Shunpeng Chen, Yukun Song, Sifan Zhou, Kaize Luo, Shibiao Xu, Yuehua Zhao 等 9 位作者

Scientific experiments are increasingly selected, executed and interpreted by learned systems that act through physical interfaces. Robot learning builds physical competence, whereas AI for science chooses which experiment to run, each reporting different endpoints. This review treats their interface as one problem, embodied AI for science, where the experiment itself is partially observed: specimen state, apparatus state and measurement processes are latent, actions are costly and irreversible, and missingness depends on execution and outcome. We organize the literature by three closures operating at distinct levels: operational closure (the experiment realized is the one intended), epistemic closure (the result updates beliefs or selects subsequent experiments) and evidential closure (the record supports a claim). We analyze workflows through a record-linked evidence cycle - Record, Diagnose, Calibrate, Confirm - as analytic functions with feedback. A taxonomy crosses these closures with six delegated decisions and five embodiment classes. Our formulation separates commanded, realized and observed conditions and models diagnosis with explicit resource, risk and sample-change costs. We compare experiment-selection methods by terminal decision, review perception, protocol compilation, visuomotor policies, world models, recovery and transfer by evidence emission requirements, and compare chemistry, materials, biology, microscopy and field workflows by what their records establish. An appendix provides an evidence map of 28 workflows (26 physical, two software-boundary), characterizing validation pathways and claim confirmation requirements. We propose evaluation that separates actions, valid experiments, campaigns and confirmed claims, framing open challenges as controlled comparisons with measurable failure conditions.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗