Ziyi Wang, Li Li, Aolin Zhou, Yankun Shen, Chonghan Liu, Shuxia Lin, Xu Yang
Most Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are built by extending pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) with visual modules and multimodal alignment. However, this multimodal scaling often degrades the language-side reasoning ability originally encoded in the base LLM. While the base LLM retains usable reasoning after scaling, the aligned VLM itself cannot reliably access this ability. Therefore, recovering the degraded reasoning capability in VLMs would benefit more from seeking help from the base LLM than from the VLM alone. Motivated by this, we propose LIFT (Language-side reasonIng Facilitation and Transfer), a lightweight vector-intervention method that transfers reasoning capability from the base LLM to the VLM without retraining the backbone. LIFT defines Reasoning Vectors as answer-token hidden-state differences between a Reasoner path with an explicit reasoning trace and a Solver path without it, and injects these vectors into language-side activations of the target VLM. LIFT further supports learnable vector adaptation while keeping the VLM backbone frozen. We evaluate LIFT on two VLMs across six reasoning benchmarks, comparing Reasoning Vectors extracted from the base LLM and from the aligned VLM under matched protocols. Results show that LLM-derived vectors consistently outperform VLM-derived vectors, confirming that the base LLM is a more effective source for recovering reasoning. LIFT partially recovers degraded reasoning through lightweight language-side interventions. Further analyses show that Reasoning Vectors influence intermediate reasoning behavior rather than merely altering final answers. The source code will be released soon.
Reinforcement learning has become an effective approach for improving video generation, but its success depends heavily on reliable reward models. Existing methods either map videos directly to opaque scalar scores or generate free-form rationales that are not explicitly optimized as the basis of the final judgment. We propose ArtiVidRM, a verifiable, artifact-as-rubrics video reward model that follows an observe-then-score paradigm. It first identifies visible generation artifacts and organizes them into a structured artifact list, then uses these artifacts as explicit rubrics for quality assessment. This intermediate representation grounds each score in concrete video-level evidence, making the reward more interpretable and informative for optimization. We further introduce a multi-reward reinforcement learning strategy to jointly optimize artifact prediction and quality assessment. The reward decomposes into complementary objectives that evaluate artifact prediction quality, including semantic coverage and prediction efficiency, together with a pairwise preference objective that supervises quality ranking through score differences. By jointly optimizing the intermediate artifact representation and the downstream preference prediction, the model learns to produce informative artifact lists while improving the accuracy of video quality assessment. Experiments show that ArtiVidRM achieves state-of-the-art performance on video preference benchmarks, provides effective signals for video diffusion optimization, and enables artifact-guided refinement of closed-source video generators.
Yeqing Teng, Jiasheng Si Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Shuxia Lin Southeast University, Linhai Zhang, Weiyu Zhang, Wenpeng Lu, Deyu Zhou Southeast University, Xiaoming Wu Qilu University of Technology
With the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) reshaping the information ecosystem, the concern with the sociological validity of claim detection benchmarks is increasing. Current claim detection benchmarks predominantly treat claims as static textual artifacts, overlooking the sociological etiology of how information naturally emerges and mutates. In this paper, we propose an evolutionary paradigm that models claims as socially evolving entities. In specific, we introduce a socially generative framework for synthetic claim generation, a multi-agent simulation grounded in the Open Claims Model. By decomposing claims into context, utterance, and proposition, our approach enables the precise simulation of unmitigated propagation to capture truth decay, and intervened propagation with multi-auditor oversight for targeted generation. Furthermore, we propose the background-user-perspective (BUP) framework, which reformulates check-worthiness as a condition-dependent probability rooted in social environment. Experiments on our datasets verify the data quality and reveal how network topology and user attributes systematically shape veracity drift.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表