跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 18:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 19:21 — 2026-11-08 19:21(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 18:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 18:39(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01814

Control Barrier Functions for Safety-Aware Latent-Space Motion Planning

Chandrakiran Ravula, Siddhanth Ramesh

原文摘要

Latent-space path planning (LSPP) compresses the configuration space of a robotic manipulator into a compact, differentiable manifold learned by a variational autoencoder, enabling fast gradient-based planning without explicit inverse kinematics. Existing LSPP frameworks enforce obstacle avoidance with a binary collision classifier, whose saturated gradients near obstacle boundaries and lack of temporal structure cause the optimizer to stall and provide no forward-invariance guarantee. We replace the classifier with a neural control barrier function (CBF) learned directly in the latent space. The barrier is trained with a three-term objective that combines safe and unsafe sign constraints with a discrete-time decrease condition evaluated on transitions of an obstacle-blind nominal planner, and it is enforced at planning time by a closed-form, first-order correction that projects each goal-directed latent step back onto the CBF constraint. On a 7-DoF Franka Panda manipulator, the CBF planner achieves a 75.6\% success rate on a fixed-obstacle task, 12.0 percentage points above the best of 35 tuned classifier configurations, and 83.8\% on a multi-position task. A sweep of the decay rate $α$ characterizes the safety--performance trade-off, with the best operating points in $α\in [0.10, 0.20]$. In a fully general random-obstacle setting, success drops to 33.0\%, which we trace to covariate shift between the obstacle-blind training transitions and the states visited by the corrected planner.

cs.RO · cs.AI