Nicolas Tricard, Linzheng Wang, Jason Chen, Sili Deng
Reconstructing full flow fields from sparse sensors requires prior assumptions about unmeasured regions and physical variables. Yet it remains unclear when learned models outperform classical estimators and which aspects of their predictions can be trusted. FlowReconBench evaluates ten learned and five classical methods on three regimes: a laminar cylinder wake across Reynolds numbers, two-dimensional Kolmogorov turbulence and a large-scale three-dimensional (3D) isotropic turbulence. Methods share leakage-controlled splits and sensor draws and are scored on per-channel error, ensemble spread, calibration, spectra and cost. The leading method changes for each regime. Classical methods perform strongly in low-order and dense-sensing regimes. On the cylinder wake, linear stochastic estimation and gappy proper orthogonal decomposition lead, including for unobserved pressure. In 3D, inverse-distance weighting matches the best learned methods on observed channels. Data-driven methods become superior at decreasing sensor density or poor sensor observability. On Kolmogorov flow, continuous ranked probability score and error yield different method rankings: generative models offer broader but underdispersed ensembles, while deterministic models prioritize pointwise error. Generative models balance this tradeoff through their sampler budget, with a larger budget improving ensemble quality at higher computational cost. In 3D, scaling tests demonstrate that queryable methods are flat in memory, while full-grid construction methods run out of memory. Observing only 2 of 4 fields leaves the problem kinematically underconstrained, yet a latent model can reproduce structural similarities to the ground truth.
Linzheng Wang, Jason Chen, Nicolas Tricard, Zituo Chen, Xingsen Guo, Sili Deng
Understanding physical systems often requires recovering their full spatial state from measurements available only at sparse locations. This reconstruction becomes challenging when physical boundaries are unknown, high-resolution training fields are unavailable, or important quantities cannot be measured directly. Sparse observations may also be consistent with multiple plausible states, leading to significant reconstruction uncertainty. Here we introduce Direct Measurement-to-Field Generation (\DMF{}), a functional rectified flow framework that learns how sparse measurements drive physical-field generation end to end. Instead of relying on grid-based rasterization or runtime guidance, \DMF{} jointly learns a sensor--global--sensor representation with the generative transport, dynamically fusing local grounding with global context to evaluate physical fields at arbitrary query coordinates. Across benchmarks involving unobserved boundaries, missing high-resolution training fields, and unmeasured physical quantities, \DMF{} outperforms alternative baselines by significantly reducing reconstruction errors and preserving the fidelity of physical properties. Furthermore, its stochastic ensemble generation reliably quantifies uncertainty while improving continuous ranked probability scores. These results extend sparse reconstruction from fixed-setting point estimation toward measurement-conditioned generation of physical fields under incomplete and changing information.