跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 05:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 05:28 — 2026-11-10 05:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 05:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 04:59(北京时间)
首次观测 · 记录 #1CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:10fa8d6b13d6a075e7cfdaded57d3bdcCVF · CVPR 2026

Don't Show Pixels, Show Cues: Unlocking Visual Tool Reasoning in Language Models via Perception Programs

Janjua, Muhammad Kamran, Silva, Hugo, Niu, Di, Rashidi, Bahador

原文摘要

Multimodal language models (MLLMs) are increasingly paired with vision tools (e.g., depth, flow, correspondence) to enhance visual reasoning. However, despite access to these tool-generated visual cues, MLLMs often fail to benefit fully from them. Existing approaches typically feed raw tool outputs into the model, but these dense, pixel-level representations are misaligned with the language-native reasoning strengths of LLMs, leading to weak perception due to reliance on language priors. We argue that, in problems where vision tools can provide the necessary visual cues, the bottleneck is not more tool calls or larger MLLMs, it is how tool outputs are represented. We introduce Perception Programs (P^2), a training-free, model-agnostic method that rewrites tool outputs into compact, structured, language-native summaries that MLLMs can directly parse and reason over. Across six perception-centric tasks in BLINK, P^2 consistently yields large improvements over base models and raw tool-augmented baselines. With GPT-5 Mini as the base model, P^2 raises its accuracy from 41.35% to 86.47% on multi-view reasoning, from 52.42 to 81.45 on relative depth, and achieves a 19.66 overall average gain across tasks, setting new state-of-the-art results. Even on smaller MLLMs, e.g., InternVL3.5-4B and Qwen3VL-4B, we observe 21-25 absolute gains from P^2 across tasks when comparing to image-based tool variants, surpassing prior agentic, supervised, and RL-based tool-use methods, without any training or model modifications.

cs.CV · cs.CL · cs.AI

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表