跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 05:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 05:40 — 2026-11-08 05:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 05:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 05:04(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.00682

Testing MAX-CUT in the Adjacency Matrix Model: Tight Non-Adaptive Bounds and a Cubic Adaptive Lower Bound

Songhua He

原文摘要

We study the query complexity of approximating the MAX-CUT value to additive error $\varepsilon n^2$ in the adjacency matrix model. This was one of the first problems studied in graph property testing [GGR'98]. Previously, the best known upper bound for both adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms was $O(1/\varepsilon^6)$ [RV'07; MS'08; GMRS'22]. The only known lower bound was a trivial $Ω(1/\varepsilon^2)$ bound. We close this gap from both sides for non-adaptive algorithms, proving that its query complexity is exactly $Θ(1/\varepsilon^4)$. We also prove an adaptive $Ω(1/\varepsilon^3)$ lower bound. Our upper bound is achieved by a canonical tester that samples $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ vertices in expectation and outputs the rescaled MAX-CUT value of the induced subgraph. We prove its correctness by applying spectral truncation to the adjacency matrix, using a geometric argument to control the sampling error of the retained low-rank part and a cut-norm restriction estimate [RV'07] for the remainder. As an application, an analogous proof also yields a tight $O(1/\varepsilon^4)$ non-adaptive query upper bound for MAX-2CSP. For our lower bounds, we show indistinguishability between a uniform random graph and a random graph with a planted hidden partition. For the non-adaptive lower bound, we observe that one plus the $χ^2$-divergence between the query transcript distributions is exactly a normalized Ising partition function, which can be bounded using Boolean hypercontractivity. For the adaptive lower bound, we relate each query's distinguishing power to the prediction, based on previous answers, of whether its endpoints lie in the same part of the hidden partition. We bound the combined advantage of these predictions using the completed transcript, which lets us analyze the adaptively chosen pairs of vertices together despite their dependence on earlier answers.

cs.DS