跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 16:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 17:00 — 2026-11-05 17:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 16:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 16:20(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.05484

CoEnv: Code-Driven Exploration in Real-to-Sim Digital Twins for Multi-Arm Manipulation

Li Kang, Yutao Fan, Rui Li, Heng Zhou, Yiran Qin, Zhemeng Zhang, Songtao Huang, Xiufeng Song 等 14 位作者

General-purpose coding agents can now write, debug, and refine entire robot programs, but only if they have somewhere to practice. Physical hardware is a poor practice ground: exploratory rollouts are slow to reset and, when several arms share a workspace, unsafe. Generic simulation benchmarks are safe but do not match the geometry, assets, or viewpoints of the workspace where the robot must actually work. We present CoEx (Code-driven Exploration), which lets the agent practice in an executable digital twin of its own deployment workspace. The twin is built by CoEnv, our real-to-sim framework, which reconstructs the physical scene from multi-view RGBD into a physics simulation. Inside it, a centralized code agent explores at the program level, writing a complete multi-arm program, running it in the twin, and refining it against grounded verification (privileged state checks, checkpoint predicates on risky steps, and adaptive viewpoints against inter-arm occlusion). Verified programs transfer to hardware through collision-checked deployment. On five real-world multi-arm tasks with up to three heterogeneous robots, CoEx reaches 70% average success, against 50% for the same system without the code agent (where a VLM must choose every primitive step by step), outperforms two prior VLM-planning frameworks, and produces verified episodes at 3.8-11.7x the ablated rate. Because every verified rollout is also a demonstration, exploration leaves reusable experience behind: a $π_{0.5}$ policy fine-tuned purely on 200 agent-generated rollouts reaches 100% and 70% real-robot success on two tasks, with no human demonstrations.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO · cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗