Software development with coding agents often begins with a rough request that users refine after trying the implementation. Final correctness alone does not capture the repeated guidance this process requires. We introduce FeatureLoop, a benchmark of 61 human-reviewed tasks from 34 repositories across five primary programming languages and seven software forms. Each task follows one development goal in a persistent workspace through evolution feedback, which adds or clarifies requirements, and completion feedback, which reports failures of stated requirements. Cumulative executable checks track new behavior, repair, and preservation of earlier functionality. We evaluate 12 frontier models and find that the strongest completes 72.1% of tasks with both feedback types. Across models, however, only 15.4% of observed failed stages recover within two corrective revisions. Further analysis reveals incomplete repairs, regressions, and model-specific differences in feedback use and token efficiency, identifying obstacles to reliable, low-intervention development.
A software feature usually evolves over time: developers extend its first version as new use cases and requirements arrive, and each extension builds on code written earlier. Most feature benchmarks evaluate a single request on a fixed codebase. Feature evolution requires evaluating successive extensions on an agent's own earlier code and checking whether the feature remains correct. We introduce FeatureArc to evaluate coding agents on evolving features, together with a pipeline that constructs its tasks from repository histories. The benchmark combines dependencies between successive stages of the same feature, explicit requirements and interface contracts, and executable checks across four programming languages. The pipeline validates fail-to-pass (F2P) tests for new behavior and pass-to-pass (P2P) tests for existing behavior on the reference code before and after each stage. We evaluated 10 coding agents on 73 manually reviewed tasks of 2 to 10 stages. Each agent works in one persistent session and workspace without external test feedback or rollback. The evaluation reveals a gap between first-stage and whole-feature success: pooled success falls from 62.7% at the first stage to 28.5% when the whole feature is tested on the final code. Trajectory analysis identifies inherited defects as a common failure mechanism, present in 72.9% of failed later stages. These earlier errors often remain undetected: in stages following a failure, agents leave the earlier error unnoticed about 95% of the time, and their self-tests rarely revisit earlier stages. Evolving a feature autonomously, without human checks between stages, therefore remains a substantial challenge for current coding agents. At Tencent, the pipeline extends internal evaluations to this setting and guides the development of Hunyuan, Tencent's family of large language models.
Benchmark researchers and developers of large language models (LLMs) and other AI systems need to find relevant evaluations, locate their benchmark datasets and code, and understand the settings behind reported scores. We present Benchmark Radar, a living database and search engine for retrieval and discovery of AI benchmarks, covering LLM evaluation, agentic and tool-use benchmarks, coding, reasoning, safety, and domain-specific evaluations. The system combines daily discovery of benchmark papers, repositories, datasets, and releases with a searchable benchmark catalog, mentions in model cards and technical reports, and score histories. It retains source identities and citations so readers can inspect candidate benchmarks and their evaluation evidence. Daily discovery draws on 37 sources: 13 direct connectors and 24 first-party research and engineering feeds. The catalog contains 1,283 source records drawn from 4 benchmark catalogs and 12,916 numeric observations on 790 records. We describe collection and retrieval, audit the full catalog, and examine benchmark saturation, adoption trends, and the limits of score comparisons. A worked example walks through a complete prior-art search, showing how to query the catalog and inspect benchmark evidence when designing a new evaluation. We release the web dashboard with a benchmark leaderboard, a Pareto frontier view of score against measured use, saturation and trend views, daily feeds, downloadable evidence, a command-line interface (CLI) for offline queries, and reproducible analysis.