跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+4958新增论文
+4071其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 01:50 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 02:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 02:45 — 2026-11-05 02:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 01:50最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 02:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

13,635 已收录论文11,746 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 01:47(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39515

APPlace: Co-Optimizing Device Locations and Access Points for Routing-Aware Analog Placement

Bingyang Liu, Xiaohan Gao, Souradip Poddar, David Z. Pan

Analog layout automation remains challenging in Analog/Mixed-Signal circuit design, because parasitics and mismatches introduced during layout strongly affect circuit performance. Placement is especially critical among the layout stages, as it constrains the routing solution space and the achievable post-layout performance. Existing analytical placement methods optimize device coordinates under center-based wirelength proxies and leave access point (AP) selection to routing. In analog circuits, however, a routing pin is an extended piece of terminal metal rather than a fixed point, and the best AP on it depends on where the other connected devices are placed, so a coordinate-only placement optimizes for connection points that the router will not use. We present APPlace, a routing-aware analog placement framework that co-optimizes device locations and AP selections during global placement, followed by a legalization stage that preserves the structure established by global placement. Experimental results on four real-world analog benchmarks show that APPlace achieves better overall post-layout performance than representative baselines at comparable layout area. Ablation studies further show that removing AP co-optimization causes up to a 13 dB CMRR loss among the OTA benchmarks and a 23% increase in comparator delay.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗