跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 04:57 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 05:06 — 2026-11-07 05:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 04:57最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 04:55(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07631

MEMOIR: A Training-Free Memory Lifecycle for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Mayank Anand, Subham Raj, Aman Vaibhav Jha, Sriparna Saha

Long-horizon LLM agents require memory systems that preserve useful information across sessions and retrieve it when needed. Existing systems treat these as separate problems: memories are written prospectively with static importance scores that are never revised after use. This creates two coupled failure modes: consolidation can silently destroy evidence that future queries require, while retrieval continues to favor stale memories. We propose MEMOIR (Memory Evidence via Merge-certified, Online Importance Revision), a training-free memory lifecycle that unifies judge-gated consolidation with retrospective attribution. Before compressing memory, screening gates test whether answer-relevant evidence is preserved. After each query, attribution estimates which retrieved memories supported the answer and updates their retrieval priority. A UCB-style exploration bonus additionally encourages retrieval of under-exposed memories, reducing the risk that frequently retrieved memories crowd out useful but less-seen evidence. On 1,905 deduplicated LoCoMo QA pairs, the full retrieval stack improves evidence recall@5 by 11.92 percentage points over bare cosine, with confidence-gated feedback adding 1.50 points overall without reference answers or reranker training; a deployment-unavailable oracle adds 1.84 points overall and 8.05 points on multi-hop. Judge-gated merge changes the recall of text-based evidence from 58.82% to 59.08%, reduces the active store by 1.42%, and incurs 0 observed losses in 100 independently audited merges, with a one-sided 95% upper loss-rate bound of 2.95%. Together, these results outline a practical deployment path: no additional LLM call on the online write path, with merge screening confined to periodic offline consolidation. The lifecycle reduces to one principle: attribute usefulness after use, and screen for preservation before compression.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1646ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

HARPO: Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning for User-Aligned Conversational Recommendation

Subham Raj Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Aman Vaibhav Jha, Mayank Anand, Sriparna Saha

Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) operate under incremental preference revelation, requiring recommendation decisions under uncertainty. While recent LLM-based approaches achieve strong performance on proxy metrics such as Recall@K and BLEU, they often fail to deliver high-quality, user-aligned recommendations in practice, as they optimize intermediate objectives like retrieval accuracy or fluent generation rather than recommendation quality itself. We propose HARPO (Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning with Preference Optimization), an agentic framework that reframes conversational recommendation as a structured decision-making process optimized for multi-dimensional recommendation quality. HARPO integrates (i) hierarchical preference learning that decomposes recommendation quality into interpretable dimensions (relevance, diversity, satisfaction, and engagement) with context-dependent weighting; (ii) deliberative tree-search reasoning guided by a learned value network evaluating candidate paths on predicted quality; and (iii) domain-agnostic reasoning abstractions through Virtual Tool Operations and multi-agent refinement. We evaluate HARPO on ReDial, INSPIRED, and MUSE, demonstrating consistent improvements over strong baselines on recommendation-centric metrics while maintaining competitive response quality.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.MA

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗