跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 21:48 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 22:35 — 2026-11-08 22:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 21:48最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 21:46(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.13368

Anechoic: Onsager-Corrected Parallel Annealing for Sub-0.1 ms Dense Max-Cut on an FPGA

Seungki Hong, Kyeongwon Jeong, Taekwang Jang

原文摘要

Ising machines solve combinatorial optimization problems by annealing a network of spins. On dense problems, the least expensive hardware step updates all spins at once: stochastic cellular automata (SCA) decide every spin in parallel and read couplings only for the spins that flip. Such synchronous updates create an echo: the previous state of each spin returns to it through its neighbors. On K2000, a Max-Cut benchmark on a 2,000-node complete graph, two-thirds of all flips undo the same spin's flip one step earlier. This paper presents Anechoic, an FPGA Ising machine that subtracts this echo from every decision. Dynamical mean-field theory identifies the echo as an Onsager reaction; its one-step strength is the number of spins whose flip probability is strictly between 0 and 1, divided by twice the temperature. The decision logic already flags these spins, so the correction costs one population count per step; a temperature-scaled form needs none. An RTL engine executes a dense 2,000-spin step in 18.1 cycles plus 0.14 per flip, so every saved step and flip saves time. Both forms find better K2000 cuts at every step budget than five published binary-spin algorithms at their papers' settings. Twelve engines at 250 MHz on an AMD Alveo V80 reach a cut of at least 33,000 with 99% probability in 0.05 ms, 5.2 times faster than the fastest published hardware, at 5.4 mJ per solution; with 2-bit couplings, the temperature-scaled form is also faster than uncorrected SCA on 49 of 51 G-set graphs. On an NVIDIA GH200 GPU, the same engine is 2.3 times slower and needs 8.0 times more energy per solution, though its 240 concurrent anneals give 2.3 times the throughput. As a GlobalFoundries 22 nm ASIC at 1.25 GHz, twelve engines would reach the target in about 10 microseconds, 26 times faster than the fastest published hardware. The code is available at https://github.com/skethz/anechoic.

cs.AR