跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 16:31 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 17:52 — 2026-11-09 17:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 16:31最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 16:29(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04271

From Guidelines to Practice: Defining Requirements for AI Red-Teaming Tools

Gia Phong Tran, Thai Duong Huynh, Randolph Loh, Balachandar Gowrisankar, Zihao Wang, Moe Thu Kyaw, Jun Sun, Adams Wai-Kin Kong 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen significant developments and increased usage in recent years. AI benefits various tasks, automates decision-making, and enhances efficiency. However, AI also introduces additional attack surfaces for threat actors to perform attacks like prompt injection and jailbreaking, making security a great concern. AI security testing aims to imitate adversarial attacks or malicious inputs via manual testing or with the assistance of tools. Thus, it is critical that organizations are aware of the capabilities and limitations of the tools before using them. Existing studies provide insights on the overall architecture of AI security testing tools and raise concerns on their reliability, but their analysis is limited to attack performance. Selection of a tool for AI risk assessments should also depend on their alignment with the recommendations of industry standards, but to our knowledge, previous studies have not utilized such guidelines. To bridge this gap, we analyze several industry standards and guidelines to identify the requirements of AI testing tools. We discuss and highlight desirable features across various AI security testing tools for a variety of different AI systems. We evaluated six tools across six Large Language Models, reported on our insights, and identified gaps that should be considered by future tools.

cs.CY

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2603.03514

Sampling-Based Motion Planning with Scene Graphs Under Perception Constraints

Qingxi Meng, Emiliano Flores, Thai Duong, Vaibhav Unhelkar, Lydia E. Kavraki

原文摘要

It will be increasingly common for robots to operate in cluttered human-centered environments such as homes, workplaces, and hospitals, where the robot is often tasked to maintain perception constraints, such as monitoring people or multiple objects, for safety and reliability while executing its task. However, existing perception-aware approaches typically focus on low-degree-of-freedom (DoF) systems or only consider a single object in the context of high-DoF robots. This motivates us to consider the problem of perception-aware motion planning for high-DoF robots that accounts for multi-object monitoring constraints. We employ a scene graph representation of the environment, offering a great potential for incorporating long-horizon task and motion planning thanks to its rich semantic and spatial information. However, it does not capture perception-constrained information, such as the viewpoints the user prefers. To address these challenges, we propose MOPS-PRM, a roadmap-based motion planner, that integrates the perception cost of observing multiple objects or humans directly into motion planning for high-DoF robots. The perception cost is embedded to each object as part of a scene graph, and used to selectively sample configurations for roadmap construction, implicitly enforcing the perception constraints. Our method is extensively validated in both simulated and real-world experiments, achieving more than ~36% improvement in the average number of detected objects and ~17% better track rate against other perception-constrained baselines, with comparable planning times and path lengths.

cs.RO