跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 14:10 — 2026-11-04 14:10(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39601

GC-LIF: Spiking Group-Equivariant Neural Network With Group-Coupled Membrane Dynamics

Nhan Trong Luu, Duong Trung Luu, Thang Cong Truong

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) promise event-driven, low-power inference, but on vision tasks they still acquire rotation invariance only through data augmentation. Group-equivariant CNNs build such symmetries into the architecture, yet a faithful spiking analogue is missing: a leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron placed after a $G$-equivariant convolution can break equivariance through its membrane recurrence. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for this not to happen. The layer is equivariant at every time step if and only if the neuron parameters $(β, v_{\mathrm{th}})$ are constant along the joint orbits of the group action on the (group, space) index. We solve it in closed form, and it covers any elementwise stateful neuron. Its sufficiency half specialises a known result for equivariant recurrent networks; its necessity half rules out the heterogeneous per-neuron parameters common in SNNs. The per-channel parameterisation that satisfies it, Group-Coupled LIF (GC-LIF), is combined with $p4$ and $p4m$-equivariant convolutions and a spike-rate group max-pool into SGE-Net. On MNIST, KMNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, evaluating each checkpoint on the clean test set and all its group-transformed copies, SGE-Net trained without rotations is invariant under $C_4$ and $D_4$ and outperforms a plain SNN trained with rotations in nine of ten dataset-group pairs, whereas non-equivariant baselines lose up to $72$ percentage points in the worst case. Operator-level tests confirm the theory before and after training, and an analytical estimate places SGE-Net at $1.7\times$ the arithmetic energy of a standard CNN and $2.3\times$ below its ANN counterpart at eight time steps.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.NE · cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗