跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 18:27 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 18:27 — 2026-11-05 18:27(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 18:27最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 18:25(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04439

DualEvolve: Dual-Level Self-Evolution of Mechanism and Orchestration for Recommendation

Tianqi Gao, Chenxu Wang, Wenxuan Yang, Yueqi Mou, Biao Tang, Ming Liu, Peng Yan

Recommender systems are widely used in e-commerce and content platforms, where improvement requires repeated model design, training optimization, and experimental validation. Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate this development cycle. Sustained autonomous improvement requires agents to improve both recommendation models and their development workflows. However, task-performance-driven approaches select updates mainly by candidates' final scores, without a separate optimization signal for experimentation quality. We therefore present DualEvolve, a dual-level framework that co-evolves recommendation mechanisms and agent orchestration toward recursive self-improvement. Inner evolution revises model and training code using task feedback to improve recommendation performance. Outer evolution scores the inner-loop experimental process, updates harness and skill rules using these scores and execution traces, and adjusts orchestration choices based on next-round scores to improve the quality of subsequent experiments. Experiments on MovieLens-1M and three Amazon Reviews 2023 subsets cover four recommendation methods and 16 settings. DualEvolve achieves higher test means than Base, OpenEvolve, and DeepEvolve in all 64 setting-metric comparisons, with macro-averaged relative gains over DeepEvolve of 7.6% (HR@5) and 9.0% (NDCG@5).

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗