Tianwei Zhang, Ivy Njoki Nyagwencha, Zahraa Dirani, Shalini Joshi, Scott A. Hale
Tech-facilitated gender based violence (TFGBV) is a pervasive online harm affecting women and gender minority groups through its many direct and covert forms. Current models and annotated datasets for gendered harm detection are dominated by data from, and models trained in, Global North languages. In collaboration with civil society organizations (CSOs) from Jordan, Francophone West Africa, and Kenya, we developed a community-led approach to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant instances of TFGBV in Levantine Arabic, African French, and Swahili. We annotated the crowdsourced data using active learning to develop a small but performant dataset (N=3022) called ALTO to improve TFGBV detection in the three languages. Through benchmarking and fine-tuning experiments, we show that existing harmful content detection models show poor TFGBV recall within ALTO and improve with fine-tuning. We found that models often miss covert harms across all languages, while error rates are markedly higher in Swahili. We report the experimental results and release the annotation taxonomy, dataset, and trained models.
LLM agents increasingly rely on reusable skills to plan tasks, invoke tools, recover from errors, and complete workflows without modifying model parameters. Although these skills are typically developed to enhance benign tasks, they may also make an agent more capable of executing procedures for harmful purposes. We study this risk, which we call skill-induced behavioral misalignment: adding benign skills may cause an agent to execute external actions that violate safety requirements. We first conduct a systematic study to validate the existence of this phenomenon. It compares agents with and without benign skills across five LLM backbones and three benchmarks under matched requests. On average, skill augmentation improves benign task accuracy by 10.3 percentage points (pp), but also increases unsafe action rate (UAR) by 10.3 pp. The regression also occurs with skills curated by experts. A paired trajectory analysis shows that 24 of 50 newly unsafe trajectories fail to complete the harmful objective, revealing violations that task completion alone would miss. We further disclose multiple factors and scenarios that could exacerbate this risk. (1) Evolving skills with benign feedback can amplify unsafe execution; (2) This regression is more pronounced when retrieved skills are matched to task and contain procedural guidance; (3) Distilling benign experience into reusable skills yield higher UAR compared with their source trajectories. (4) A guard that checks proposed tool actions before execution reduces violations while retaining gains on benign tasks. All these findings confirm the significance of skill-induced behavioral misalignment, and the urgent need for new mitigation solutions.
Penetration testing is essential for assessing and strengthening system security against real-world threats, yet traditional workflows remain highly manual, expertise-intensive, and difficult to scale. Although recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising opportunities for automation, existing applications rely on simplistic prompting without task decomposition or domain adaptation, resulting in unreliable black-box behavior and limited insight into model capabilities across penetration testing stages. To address this gap, we introduce PentestEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs across six decomposed penetration testing stages: Information Collection, Weakness Gathering and Filtering, Attack Decision-Making, Exploit Generation and Revision. PentestEval integrates expert-annotated ground truth with a fully automated evaluation pipeline across 346 tasks covering all stages in 12 realistic vulnerable scenarios. Our stage-level evaluation of 9 widely used LLMs reveals generally weak performance and distinct limitations across the stages of penetration-testing workflow. End-to-end pipelines reach only 31% success rate, and existing LLM-powered systems such as PentestGPT, PentestAgent, and VulnBot exhibit similar limitations, with the evaluated autonomous agents showing particularly low success rates under our benchmark settings. These findings highlight that reliable autonomous penetration testing requires stronger structured reasoning and fine-grained stage-level diagnosis. PentestEval provides the foundational benchmark needed for future research on fine-grained, stage-level evaluation, paving the way toward more reliable LLM-based automation.