跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 16:14 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 16:54 — 2026-11-12 16:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 16:14最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 16:12(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10798

RTLREX: LLM-Guided Framework for Exact High-Level RTL Recovery

Wuqian Tang, Fangzhou Liu, Ruijie Wang, TingTing Hwang, Bei Yu, Chun-Yao Wang

原文摘要

Hardware designs may be available only as gate-level netlists or input-output descriptions when the original register-transfer-level (RTL) design and documentation are not accessible. Low-level representations obscure word-level computation and its finite-width behavior. Recovering high-level RTL from such representations therefore helps engineers understand a circuit's functionality and enables RTL rewriting and resynthesis. A plausible function model is also insufficient unless the generated RTL is equivalent to the original circuit for all input combinations. In this paper, we present RTLREX, a large language model (LLM)-guided framework that coordinates domain-specific tools for function recovery, RTL generation, independent verification, and cost-guided rewriting. Independent verification establishes equivalence between the recovered RTL and the original circuit. The LLM uses tool feedback to select further analyses, revise candidate RTL, and propose syntax-cost reductions. Experiments on 30 benchmarks from Problem A of the ICCAD 2022 CAD Contest show that RTLREX recovers equivalent high-level RTL for all benchmarks, surpassing the state-of-the-art method WolFEx in recovery coverage. On benchmarks recovered by both methods, RTLREX reduces mean syntax cost by 20.5% relative to WolFEx. On complete truth-table benchmarks from the IWLS 2026 Contest, our framework reduces mean syntax cost by 95.7% relative to an LLM agent baseline on the benchmarks validated by both methods.

cs.AR · cs.AI