跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 04:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 04:57 — 2026-11-14 04:57(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 04:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 04:52(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.16581

EmoPhone: A Multi-Wave Dataset for In-the-Wild Mobile and Wearable Affect Sensing

Panyu Zhang, Minseo Park, Soowon Kang, Tomiris Ismatzoda, Azizbek Mustafakulov, Otabek Najimov, Woohyeok Choi, Jumabek Alikhanov 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

We introduce a three-wave, in-the-wild multimodal dataset for affect sensing that integrates smartphone sensing, wearable sensing, and dense experience-sampling-method (ESM) labels collected annually from 2020 to 2022. The dataset supports moment-level affect modeling through a shared dimensional label core across all waves, with additional affective descriptors available in the third wave (D-3). We describe the resource in terms of study design, temporal density of in-situ labels, and sensing and label coverage across waves. To support evaluation within this resource, we define an initial three-setting benchmark spanning temporal prediction from within-user history, within-wave cross-user generalization, and cross-wave generalization in which each wave is treated as a separate dataset. Our benchmark results show that the strongest method family depends on the evaluation setting: supervised baselines perform best in the temporal setting, unsupervised domain adaptation is strongest overall in the within-wave cross-user setting, and domain generalization shows the strongest overall cross-wave performance, although its margin over strong baselines is modest. These findings indicate that robust mobile affective computing is constrained not only by label availability but also by substantial participant-level variability and realistic cross-wave differences inherent in longitudinal in-situ deployments.

cs.HC