跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 20:30 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 20:33 — 2026-11-12 20:33(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 20:30最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 20:24(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.19882

Multimodal Concept Bottleneck Models

Tongqing Shi, Ge Yan, Tuomas Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei Weng

原文摘要

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) enhance the interpretability of deep neural networks by aligning the features extracted from images with human-interpretable concepts. However, conventional CBMs typically use a linear classifier that maps concept activations to a fixed set of predefined classes, limiting their flexibility in open-vocabulary settings. In this paper, we propose Multimodal Concept Bottleneck Model (MM-CBM) to address these issues and extend CBMs into CLIP structure. MM-CBM utilizes dual Concept Bottleneck Layers (CBLs) to align both the image and text embeddings into interpretable features. This allows us to perform new vision tasks like zero-shot classification or image retrieval in an interpretable way. Compared to existing methods, MM-CBM achieves 23.28% accuracy improvement on average across four standard benchmarks. Our method maintains competitive performance compared with black-box CLIP model while offering interpretability. Under classification tasks, MM-CBM's accuracy is on average 3.94% lower than CLIP in the target-dataset adaptation setting and 9.84% in the zero-shot transfer setting. Under image-text retrieval tasks, it achieves an average gap of 2.48% for image retrieval and 9.22% for text retrieval.

cs.CV · cs.LG