跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 01:54 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 02:39 — 2026-11-10 02:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 01:54最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 01:52(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05567

MESA: An Evaluation Framework for Compositional, Semantic, and Spatial Generalization in Robotics

Albert Wilcox, Frank Chang, Nhi Nguyen, Aishani Chakraborty, Jeremy A. Collins, Vaibhav Saxena, Benjamin Joffe, Siddharth Karamcheti 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Despite growing interest in foundation models for robotic manipulation, systematic evaluation of their capabilities remains elusive. Existing benchmarks are either narrow and saturated, offering little signal on SOTA methods, broadly scoped, providing diversity at the cost of controlled experimentation, or require training on large, messy open-source datasets. We introduce MESA, an evaluation framework designed for precise, reproducible measurement of language-conditioned policy generalization. MESA provides five evaluation suites that isolate in-distribution performance and four distinct axes of generalization: spatial configuration, object instance, object category, and subtask composition, enabling researchers to diagnose where and why policies fail, not just whether they fail. To populate these suites at scale, we develop MESA-Gen, a pipeline for task and demonstration generation built by improving MimicGen. We instantiate the framework on two platforms and release both: the single-arm MESA suite, and BiMESA, the first large-scale benchmark for bimanual generalization. We evaluate seven baseline methods spanning diffusion policies, VLM-based approaches, and pretrained VLAs, finding that the strongest model achieves only 52% on MESA and 49% on BiMESA, providing meaningful signal while leaving ample room for progress. MESA rankings are broadly consistent with RoboArena scores, suggesting that MESA captures method-level differences relevant beyond simulation. Project website: https://pairlab.github.io/MESA.

cs.RO · cs.AI

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.53ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Think Like You Execute: Verifiable Chain of Thought from Program Traces

Shailja Thakur, Vaibhav Saxena, Rohan Kulkarni, Shivdeep Singh, Parameswaran Selvam, Hiroshi Kanayama, Hima Patel

原文摘要

Teaching language models to reason about code execution is still an open problem. Current synthetic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) training data often consists of plausible-sounding explanations generated by teacher models, not verifiable accounts of actual program behavior. This causes models to learn logically flawed reasoning patterns despite syntactic correctness.We address this by grounding CoT generation directly in program execution traces. Our pipeline instruments code to capture dynamic behavior, narrates execution traces into natural language, and actively verifies each rationale against the trace. We systematically create 54,000 execution-verified, bi-directional rationales that teach models to reason both forward (input\rightarrowoutput) and backward (output\rightarrowinput). Models fine-tuned on our verified data achieve substantial improvements, with a performance boost of +24.2 on LiveCodeBench-Exec, +22.3 on CruxEval-Output, and +21.1 on CruxEval-Input, demonstrating that verification quality directly determines both reasoning and code generation capabilities.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表