跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 16:36 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 17:30 — 2026-11-08 17:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 16:36最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 16:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.07226

Dual-Node NVIDIA DGX Spark over Tailscale: A Remote-Access Testbed for Distributed LLM Training and Cyber-Threat-Intelligence Fine-Tuning

Vasanth Iyer

原文摘要

Practical evidence for multi-node training on desktop-class accelerators remains limited. This report presents a proof-of-concept deployment of distributed NanoChat pretraining across two NVIDIA DGX Spark systems, each with a GB10 Grace Blackwell system-on-chip and 128 GB of unified memory, administered remotely over a Tailscale mesh VPN and connected for training by a dedicated 200 Gb/s QSFP56 direct fiber link. PyTorch torchrun, DDP, and NCCL were configured with one process per node, a depth-20 NanoChat model, a device batch of 32 sequences per node, a 2,048-token context, and eight gradient-accumulation steps, giving 1,048,576 tokens per optimizer step for the 896.5-million-parameter model. The run took 4,980 steps over about four days, averaging 63.4 s of measured training time per step (about 16,540 tokens/s) and processing about 5.22 billion tokens. We document link configuration, container setup, interface binding, a step-zero evaluation bug that triggered NCCL timeouts, checkpointing, and troubleshooting lessons. We also built a cybersecurity fine-tuning dataset from 77 CISA advisories (338 training, 37 validation conversations) and compared a baseline SFT checkpoint against a CTI-augmented checkpoint on 17 held-out prompts with an Ollama-hosted LLM judge: CTI-specific categories improved while general-knowledge categories regressed, for a small overall change from 2.06 to 2.29 on a 0-10 scale. Version 2 adds a stage-2 fine-tune with a MITRE ATT&CK technique dictionary under a deterministic evaluation: in-dictionary ID-to-name lookup reaches 98.5%, yet none of 50 held-out IDs is named correctly, knowledge of held-out threat groups, software, campaigns, and vulnerabilities stays near zero, and general ability drops measurably. The study establishes feasibility rather than a scaling-efficiency claim.

cs.AR · cs.LG