跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+4758新增论文
+3871其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 01:50 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 02:29各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 02:30 — 2026-11-05 02:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 01:50最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 02:29库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

13,435 已收录论文11,546 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 01:47(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38062

Ignore the Writing: A Proposal for Peer Review in the Age of AI

Vassilis Kostakos

The written paper has long stood in as proof of work: a fluent, well-structured manuscript was taken as evidence that good research lay behind it. Generative AI has broken that link. Polished manuscripts now cost nothing to produce, submissions are outgrowing what reviewers can absorb, and venues are turning to AI for help. The logical endpoint is a loop where AI writes the papers and AI reviews them. We argue that this loop is survivable, but only if it is given a reward function, and that human reviewing effort should become that reward function. We propose that submissions should consist of a 1500-word brief plus an unlimited, machine-verifiable appendix. Human reviewers judge whether a pursuit is worthwhile, models verify the experimental record in the appendix, and human curation decides where the field goes next.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.HC · cs.DL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.29483

VitalAgent: A Tool-Augmented Agent for Reactive and Proactive Physiological Monitoring over Wearable Health Data

Di Zhu, Yu Yvonne Wu, Hong Jia, Aaqib Saeed, Vassilis Kostakos, Ting Dang

Wearable devices provide continuous access to physiological signals such as ECG and PPG, offering a path to answering users' questions about their own physiological state and to early detection of cardiac and physiological abnormalities. Yet existing mobile health (mHealth) systems are largely limited to task-specific prediction pipelines or reactive question answering over static summaries. They lack the temporal reasoning, persistent physiological context, and proactive monitoring required for long-term signal streams. To advance this setting, we introduce VitalBench, a longitudinal physiological monitoring benchmark comprising 1,862 QA pairs for reactive question answering and 90.2 hours of continuous ECG/PPG recordings for proactive monitoring, covering cardiac, physical activity, and stress-related tasks. Building on this resource, we propose VitalAgent, a tool-augmented agentic framework for ECG/PPG-based mHealth that supports both reactive question answering and proactive monitoring. VitalAgent is built on a longitudinal physiological memory and a tool-augmented reasoning interface that enables dynamic computation over raw signals. Experiments demonstrate that VitalAgent achieves over 25 points absolute improvement over prompt-based and agentic baselines in reactive evaluation and enables proactive alert monitoring over long-term physiological signals, pointing toward mHealth systems that can both answer questions about and continuously monitor a person's physiological state beyond the clinic.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗