跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 05:07 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 06:01 — 2026-11-09 06:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 05:07最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 05:05(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38611

V-CAPE: Visual Consistency Assessment for Product Image Editing

Iaroslav Melekhov, Roberto Alcover Couso, Francesco Taioli, Daniel Coelho, Artur Bekasov, Virginia Fernandez Arguedas, Jose Miguel Grande Saiz

原文摘要

Recent advances in generative image editing enable complex transformations such as background replacement, object manipulation, and pose adjustment from natural language instructions. However, verifying that these transformations preserve visual consistency, defined as the preservation of an object's intrinsic visual attributes, including geometry, texture, color, and fine-grained details, remains a largely unsolved problem. This challenge is particularly pronounced at scale, where manual inspection is infeasible and automated quality assessment (AutoQA) could become essential. In this work, we introduce Visual Consistency Assessment for Product Image Editing (V-CAPE), a large-scale dataset for evaluating visual consistency in generative image editing. The dataset consists of 40K unique source-target product image pairs, each annotated with binary accept/reject labels and structured failure modes capturing fine-grained inconsistencies such as geometric distortions, pose errors, and identity mismatches. V-CAPE combines real-world edited images with a synthetic subset constructed from 3D assets, enabling both realistic evaluation and controlled analysis. Vision-language models (VLMs) across all evaluated size categories on AutoQA achieve accuracy below 65%, indicating that the dataset poses a substantial challenge regardless of model scale. Our results highlight fundamental limitations of current models in verifying visual consistency under transformation, positioning V-CAPE as a benchmark for advancing fine-grained image editing evaluation.

cs.CV