跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 20:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 21:00 — 2026-11-13 21:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 20:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 20:29(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15013

Protecting Sensitive Knowledge Under LLM Unlearning: The Proxy Threat and a Superposition-Aware Defense

Jiayang Li, Tianqing Zhu, Longxiang Gao, Huajie Chen, Dayong Ye, Shang Wang, Huan Huo, Wanlei Zhou

原文摘要

Machine unlearning lets the owner of large language models (LLMs) remove specific entities from a trained model without retraining from scratch. Existing machine unlearning methods focus on removing the requested entities while maintaining utility. However, we observe that the representations of distinct entities in an LLM may overlap in shared parameter subspaces, a phenomenon known as knowledge superposition. Removing one entity may then affect other entities. This exposes a new security threat: legitimate unlearning requests can be exploited to remove sensitive entities that were never requested. This threat is unlike data poisoning or backdoor attacks. We define the attack as the Proxy Unlearning Attack (PUA), which selects removable proxy entities superposed with a sensitive target. The attack can even occur unintentionally, when benign users accidentally remove entities superposed with a sensitive one. In response, we propose Superposition-Aware Unlearning Protection (SAUP), a general defense framework that can be applied to unlearning requests to ensure a correct removal. SAUP performs in two stages. Before unlearning, it uses superposition detection to estimate which sensitive entities the request puts at risk. After unlearning, it decouples the shared representations and restores the affected entities, while keeping the requested entities suppressed. Our findings reveal that legitimate unlearning requests can be maliciously exploited through knowledge superposition. When dealing with unlearning requests, LLM providers need representation-level detection and recovery mechanisms to mitigate this threat and protect sensitive knowledge.

cs.CR

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14978

Hijacking a Trusted LLM in Real-World Quantized Deployments Only Requires a Disguised Adapter

Jiayang Li, Tianqing Zhu, Huan Huo, Heng Xu, Shang Wang, Wanlei Zhou

原文摘要

Third-party low-rank adaptation (LoRA) adapters are tailored to perform decision tasks such as content moderation and function selection. However, in the real world, quantized deployments carry a potential threat in that an adapter can pass an audit with the unquantized base, yet hijack decisions when the same base is quantized for deployment. Demonstrating this threat requires an adapter that preserves benign behavior before quantization, but hijacks decisions afterward. Further, this must hold without modifying the trusted base or knowing the victim's quantization configuration. We therefore present QHijack-LoRA, an adapter-only attack that uses the base model's natural quantization residual to activate decision hijacking. The attacker modifies neither the trusted base model nor the victim's quantization configuration. With QHijack-LoRA, a four-objective training procedure separates full-precision dormancy from quantized target activation, while preserving clean-input behavior. The adapter is trained across several different quantization methods, while adaptive reweighting and residual-direction augmentation extend the attack to unseen configurations. Our results show that auditing performed exclusively under full-precision conditions does not provide assurance of decision integrity in quantized deployment environments. Thus, we also propose a cross-precision paired audit that checks the candidate adapter in its intended deployment configuration. This work shows the critical need to audit third-party adapters in any potential quantized deployment.

cs.CR