跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 11:30 — 2026-11-04 11:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39205

Sparse Autoencoders as Implicit Diversification Regularisers for Cross-Sectional Cryptocurrency Returns

Weijia Han, Lisha Qu

Factor models are central to asset pricing and portfolio construction, but neural factors are often difficult to interpret, and their effect on portfolio risk is unclear. A sparse autoencoder (SAE) may address both concerns by describing daily returns across many assets with only a few active features. We ask whether this sparse representation produces stable financial factors and better-diversified portfolios. We study cryptocurrency returns, use equities as a secondary test, and compare the SAE with common benchmarks in a time-ordered evaluation. We find consistently lower volatility in SAE portfolios and link this result to lower correlations among the selected assets. However, the SAE does not outperform a simple contrarian strategy on risk-adjusted return, and its factor identities are not stable across training runs. Our contribution is to show that sparse coding can support portfolio diversification, while clearly separating this risk effect from claims about alpha or stable factor identities.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · q-fin.PM · q-fin.ST
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34891

Checkpoint Reload Explains Most of the Measured State Gap in Two State Discovery Reproductions

Weijia Han, Lisha Qu

Temporal models that maintain per-sequence latent states during training must reconstruct those states when the stored table is unavailable at inference. This creates a basic consistency question: do the reconstructed states agree with those formed during training? We study this question for State Discovery in World Machine, which updates stored states in parallel each epoch but performs inference by sequential rollout from an all-zero start. On Toy1D, we analyze two paired-checkpoint runs whose decoded-state MSE is 27 to 36 percent above the published value. We compare the stored table with rollouts under the best-validation checkpoint reloaded after training and the last-epoch weights that wrote the table. Matching the rollout to the table-writing weights removes 90 to 91 percent of the mean per-dimension Wasserstein-1 distance. Causal distillation and frozen SD updates do not satisfy their pre-specified criteria under either checkpoint. Overall, checkpoint reload accounts for most of the measured gap in these runs.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗