跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 21:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 21:48 — 2026-11-11 21:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 21:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 21:29(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10965

Bayesian transfer for offline Q-learning with multi-task Gaussian processes

Wenxing Guo

原文摘要

Offline reinforcement learning can benefit from data collected in related tasks, yet indiscriminate knowledge transfer may lead to negative transfer under task mismatch and limited target-data coverage. We propose a target-aware Bayesian transfer framework for offline Q-learning based on multi-task Gaussian processes that jointly model task-specific Q-functions. Source tasks are assessed using target predictive evidence and maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), while posterior uncertainty and behavior-supported action sets guide conservative Bellman updates and policy extraction. To account for the dependence induced by Bellman bootstrapping, we distinguish Bellman innovations from bootstrap errors and establish stability and predictive source-selection results under explicit regularity conditions. We further derive selection-adaptive posterior contraction and offline policy-performance bounds, identifying the structural conditions under which source information can be pooled to achieve minimax-optimal rates in a shared-function Gaussian sequence experiment. Simulation studies with heterogeneous source tasks demonstrate improved target Q-function estimation and reduced material negative transfer compared with indiscriminate source pooling. An application to human decision-making data further shows higher average expected immediate payoff than both target-only learning and matched-size random source selection. These results highlight the benefits of combining target-aware source selection with uncertainty-aware conservative learning for reliable and sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning.

stat.ML · cs.LG