跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 10:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 13:19 — 2026-11-08 13:19(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 10:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 10:15(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07634

AiXapply: Fast and Reliable Full-File Code Integration with Specialized Small Models for IDE Workflows

Siyuan Jiang, Xiang Cai, Peixu Wang, Yu Han, Yihong Dong, Wei Ning, Xuyuan Guo, Jincheng Wen 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Large language models increasingly assist developers by proposing small code edits, yet reliably integrating a partial update snippet into an existing file while preserving unrelated content remains poorly supported by current code-generation workflows. We formalize the Code Integration (Apply) task as follows: given an original file and an update snippet, the system must produce the complete merged file while preserving all content outside the requested edit. We construct a high-quality multi-language dataset from real commits via a structured pipeline that converts code changes into update snippets paired with full-file ground truth and enforces consistency through verification and filtering. We then train a specialized 4B model, aiXapply, using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (GRPO). The supervised variant achieves 94.4% accuracy under our language-aware comparison, surpassing a strong large-model (Deepseek-V3.2) baseline (91.6%). Speculative decoding enables aiXapply-RL to reach $\sim$2700 tokens/s on a single A100 in a decoding subset; on the full benchmark, it achieves roughly 75$\times$ lower latency than the API-served Deepseek-V3.2 baseline. We further conduct an industrial deployment of aiXapply-RL in the aiXcoder IDE plugin as a dedicated Apply service, reducing mean Apply latency from 50 seconds to 1.89 seconds by offloading full-file generation from the upstream large model. Under time-based capacity planning, replacing one of five upstream serving instances would save 20% of upstream machine cost before the additional shared A100 service cost. Overall, our results demonstrate that treating code integration as a standalone task enables small models to achieve high accuracy, practical efficiency, and concrete industrial benefits in real-world IDE workflows where latency, cost and privacy are critical.

cs.SE

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2607.27703

SpatialCLI: Learning to Reason With Spatial Tools, Then Without Them

Yang Zhou, Zixuan Huang, Sunzhu Li, Zhuo Yang, Chen Zhang, Shunian Chen, Caijun Yan, Jianyao Xu 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in embodied agents to interpret visual inputs, reason about spatial relationships, and make task-level decisions based on that reasoning. However, a fundamental capability mismatch remains: general VLMs can reason about the overall task but often miss the visual details that determine success, while specialist vision models can capture those details but cannot translate them into task-level decisions. In this work, we propose SpatialCLI, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide. SpatialCLI proceeds in three stages: (1) Call exposes specialist vision models as spatial tools to augment the VLM's perception; (2) Learn uses Cold-Start SFT and agentic RL to improve tool use; and (3) Internalize verbalizes successful tool-use trajectories to internalize specialist perceptual capabilities. We further introduce SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose. On MindCube, SpatialCLI raises Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct from 29.3% to 84.6% with tools, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol with tools (72.1%), while retaining 73.8% without tools after internalization.

cs.AI